Cited by 72Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Epidemiology, Co-Morbidities, and Medication Use of Patients with Alzheimer's Disease or Vascular Dementia in the UK

Imfeld, Patrick, Brauchli Pernus, Yolanda B., Jick, Susan S., Meier, Christoph R.·2013·Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract

Epidemiologic studies on age-specific incidence rates (IRs) separating Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular dementia (VaD) in the UK are scarce. We sought to assess IRs of AD and VaD in the UK and to compare co-morbidities and medication use between patients with AD, VaD, or without dementia. We identified cases aged ≥65 years with an incident diagnosis of AD or VaD between 1998 and 2008 using the General Practice Research Database (GPRD). We assessed IRs, stratified by age and gender, matched one dementia-free control patient to each demented patient, and analyzed co-morbidities and medication use. We identified 7,086 AD and 4,438 VaD cases. Overall, the IR of AD was 1.59/1,000 person-years (py) (95% CI 1.55-1.62) and the IR of VaD 0.99/1,000 py (95% CI 0.96-1.02). For AD, IRs were higher for women than for men, but not for VaD. Except for orthostatic hypotension, the prevalence of all cardiovascular (CV) co-morbidities and exposure to CV drugs was lower in patients with AD than in corresponding controls, whereas the opposite was true for VaD. The lower prevalence of CV diseases in patients with AD may be a true finding or the result of a channeling effect, i.e., the possibility that demented patients with CV diseases may be more likely diagnosed with VaD than AD.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-121819

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dementia codes in the CPRD reflect diagnoses well with a positive predictive value of 95%.

    “Dementia codes in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) reflect diagnoses well with a positive predictive value of 95%.23”
  • The dementia code list used in this study was derived by comparing a previous published list with the Department of Health's Quality and Outcomes Framework list; the two lists overlapped almost completely, and the combined list was reviewed by the clinical team.

    “Dementia codes were derived by comparing a previous published list with the Department of Health’s Quality and Outcomes Framework list of business codes for dementia.23 24 These two code lists overlapped almost completely. The combined list was reviewed by our clinical team, and all codes were included in our final definition—except those that related explicitly to alcohol related dementia”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Imfeld, P., Brauchli Pernus, Y. B., Jick, S. S., & Meier, C. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • Basel Pharmacoepidemiology Unit, Division of Clinical Pharmacy and Epidemiology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
  • Boston University (US)
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Published
2013-05-06
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
565-573
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W1479723682
Cited by
72
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4
FWCI
4.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • AstraZeneca
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Cardiovascular Agents, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Dementia, Vascular, Comorbidity, Incidence, Nootropic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review