Cited by 14Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

The Modified Frontal Behavioral Inventory (FBI-mod) for patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration, Alzheimer’s disease, and mild cognitive impairment

Suhonen, Noora-Maria, Hallikainen, Ilona, Hänninen, Tuomo, Jokelainen, Jari, Krüger, Johanna, Hall, Anette, Pikkarainen, Maria, Soininen, Hilkka +1 more·2017·Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease

Abstract

While behavioral symptoms are both early and prevalent features of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), they can be present in other types of dementia as well, including Alzheimer's disease (AD) and even mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The Frontal Behavioral Inventory (FBI) was specifically developed to capture the behavioral and personality changes in bvFTD; it has also been modified into a self-administered caregiver questionnaire (FBI-mod). We examined the utility of the FBI-mod in differentiating bvFTD (n = 26), primary progressive aphasia (PPA) (n = 7), AD (n = 53), and MCI (n = 50) patients, and investigated how the FBI-mod may be associated with neuropsychological measures. The bvFTD patients scored significantly higher as compared to all other patient groups on the FBI-mod Total (p < 0.005), Negative (p < 0.005), and Positive (p < 0.01) scores. The cut-off point for the FBI-mod Total score that best discriminated the bvFTD and AD patients in our sample was 16, thus substantially lower than reported for the original FBI. For the bvFTD group, only mild correlations emerged between the FBI-mod and the cognitive measures. However, significant correlations between the FBI-mod and depressive symptoms as measured by the BDI-II were found for bvFTD. This suggests that while behavioral symptoms appear independent from cognitive deficits in bvFTD, they may nevertheless be interrelated with depressive symptoms. We conclude that the FBI-mod is an easily administer…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-160983

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suhonen, N.-M., Hallikainen, I., Hänninen, T., Jokelainen, J., Krüger, J., Hall, A., Pikkarainen, M., Soininen, H., & Remes, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Oulu University Hospital (FI)
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
  • Kuopio University Hospital (FI)
Corresponding author
Remes, Anne M.
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
Published
2017-01-20
Volume
56
Issue
4
Pages
1241-1251
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W2571805574
Cited by
14
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEF eRepo (University of Eastern Finland) (acceptedVersion)
  • UEF eRepo (University of Eastern Finland) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
Frontal Behavioral Inventory, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia
MeSH terms
Mental Status and Dementia Tests, Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Cognition, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Sensitivity and Specificity, Aphasia, Primary Progressive, Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review