Cited by 28Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research

Structural anatomical investigation of long term memory deficit in behavioral frontotemporal dementia

Open access
Bertoux, Maxime, Flanagan, Emma C., Hobbs, Matthew, Ruiz-Tagle, Amparo, Delgado, Carolina, Miranda, Marcelo, Ibáñez, Agustín, Slachevsky, Andrea +1 more·2018·Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease

Abstract

Although a growing body of work has shown that behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) could present with severe amnesia in approximately half of cases, memory assessment is currently the clinical standard to distinguish bvFTD from Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Thus, the concept of “relatively preserved episodic memory” in bvFTD remains the basis of its clinical distinction from AD and a criterion for bvFTD’s diagnosis. This view is supported by the idea that bvFTD is not characterized by genuine amnesia and hippocampal degeneration, by contrast to AD. In this multicenter study, we aimed to investigate the neural correlates of memory performance in bvFTD as assessed by the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT). Imaging explorations followed a two-step procedure, first relying on a visual rating of atrophy of 35 bvFTD and 34 AD patients’ MRI, contrasted with 29 controls; and then using voxel-based morphometry (VBM) in a subset of bvFTD patients. Results showed that 43% of bvFTD patients presented with a genuine amnesia. Data-driven analysis on visual rating data showed that, in bvFTD, memory recall & storage performances were significantly predicted by atrophy in rostral prefrontal and hippocampal/perihippocampal regions, similar to mild AD. VBM results in bvFTD (p FWE <0.05) showed similar prefrontal and hippocampal regions in addition to striatal and lateral temporal involvement. Our findings showed the involvement of prefrontal as well as medial/lateral temporal atrophy in memory deficits of bvFTD patients. This contradicts the common view that only frontal deficits explain memory impairment in this disease and plead for an updated view on memory dysfunctions in bvFTD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-170771

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 10% of pathologically-confirmed bvFTD subjects show marked episodic memory deficits at initial presentation.

    “Furthermore, 10% of pathologically-confirmed bvFTD subjects show marked episodic memory deficits at initial presentation, contrary to current diagnostic criteria (Hodges et al. , 2004; Hornberger and Piguet, 2012; Bertoux et al. , 2018).”

    From Recommendations to distinguish behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia from psychiatric disorders (2020) · cites this paper as Bertoux et al. , 2018

    The Introduction says episodic memory impairment is not contemplated as a bvFTD presentation in current diagnostic criteria, and the paper reports genuine amnesia in some bvFTD patients. But its Participants section describes clinically diagnosed, probable bvFTD—not pathologically confirmed cases—and its Abstract reports 43% with genuine amnesia, not 10%. The cited passages do not establish that the deficits were present at initial presentation. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, Johansen-Berg H, Bannister PR, De Luca M, Drobnjak I, Flitney DE, Niazy RK, Saunders J, Vickers J, Zhang Y, De Stefano N, Brady JM, Matthews PM (2004) Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 23, S208-S219.
  2. Zhang Y, Brady M, Smith S (2001) Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20, 45-57.
  3. Rueckert D, Sonoda LI, Hayes C, Hill DL, Leach MO, Hawkes DJ (1999) Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: Application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18, 712-721.
  4. Manes F, Springer J, Jorge R, Robinson RG (1999) Ver- bal memory impairment after left insular cortex infarction. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 67, 532-534.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bertoux, M., Flanagan, E. C., Hobbs, M., Ruiz-Tagle, A., Delgado, C., Miranda, M., Ibáñez, A., Slachevsky, A., & Hornberger, M.
Affiliations
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • Laboratorio de Neurosciencas, Centro de Investigación Avanzada en Educación, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
  • University of Chile (CL)
  • Clínica Las Condes (CL)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Bertoux, Maxime
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
Published
2018-03-24
Volume
62
Issue
4
Pages
1887-1900
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W2794678786
Cited by
28
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Universidad de Chile (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • Fundación INECO (15150012)
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (1170010, 15150012, CONICYT/FONDAP 15150012)
  • Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (1170010, FONDAP-15150012, 15150012)
  • Fondo para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (2012-0412, 2012‐1309)
  • Fondo de Financiamiento de Centros de Investigación en Áreas Prioritarias (15150012)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Keywords
behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, long-term memory deficits
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Atrophy, Brain, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Memory Disorders, Mental Recall, Frontotemporal Dementia, Memory, Long-Term, Memory, Episodic, Gray Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review