Cited by 19Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus

Added diagnostic value of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for differential dementia diagnosis in an autopsy-confirmed cohort

Open access
Niemantsverdriet, Ellis, Feyen, Bart F.E., Le Bastard, Nathalie, Martin, Jean-Jacques, Goeman, Johan, De Deyn, Peter Paul, Bjerke, Maria, Engelborghs, Sebastiaan·2018·Journal of Alzheimer s Disease

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Differential dementia diagnosis remains a challenge due to overlap of clinical profiles, which often results in diagnostic doubt. OBJECTIVE: Determine the added diagnostic value of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for differential dementia diagnosis as compared to autopsy-confirmed diagnosis. METHODS: Seventy-one dementia patients with autopsy-confirmed diagnoses were included in this study. All neuropathological diagnoses were established according to standard neuropathological criteria and consisted of Alzheimer's disease (AD) or other dementias (NONAD). CSF levels of Aβ1 - 42, T-tau, and P-tau181 were determined and interpreted based on the IWG-2 and NIA-AA criteria, separately. A panel of three neurologists experienced with dementia made clinical consensus dementia diagnoses. Clinical and CSF biomarker diagnoses were compared to the autopsy-confirmed diagnoses. RESULTS: Forty-two patients (59%) had autopsy-confirmed AD, whereas 29 patients (41%) had autopsy-confirmed NONAD. Of the 24 patients with an ambiguous clinical dementia diagnosis, a correct diagnosis would have been established in 67% of the cases applying CSF biomarkers in the context of the IWG-2 or the NIA-AA criteria respectively. CONCLUSION: AD CSF biomarkers have an added diagnostic value in differential dementia diagnosis and can help establishing a correct dementia diagnosis in case of ambiguous clinical dementia diagnoses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-170927

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Niemantsverdriet, E., Feyen, B. F. E., Le Bastard, N., Martin, J.-J., Goeman, J., De Deyn, P. P., Bjerke, M., & Engelborghs, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
  • Reference Center for Biological Markers of Dementia (BIODEM), Laboratory of Neurochemistry and Behavior, and Biobank, Institute Born-Bunge, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
  • ZNA Middelheim Hospital (BE)
Corresponding author
Engelborghs, Sebastiaan
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Published
2018-04-10
Volume
63
Issue
1
Pages
373-381
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W2794653302
Cited by
19
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Agentschap Innoveren en Ondernemen
  • European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (115372)
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • Universiteit Antwerpen
  • Vlaamse regering
  • Instituut Born-Bunge
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Keywords
cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Autopsy, Dementia, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Peptide Fragments, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Cohort Studies, Biomarkers, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review