Cited by 59Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Early-Stage Identification and Pathological Development of Alzheimer’s Disease Using Multimodal MRI

Yan, Tianyi, Wang, Yonghao, Weng, Zizheng, Du, Wenying, Liu, Tiantian, Chen, Duanduan, Li, Xuesong, Wu, Jinglong +1 more·2019·Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is one of the most common progressive and irreversible neurodegenerative diseases. The study of the pathological mechanism of AD and early-stage diagnosis is essential and important. Subjective cognitive decline (SCD), the first at-risk stage of AD occurring prior to amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), is of great research value and has gained our interest. To investigate the entire pathological development of AD pathology efficiently, we proposed a machine learning classification method based on a multimodal support vector machine (SVM) to investigate the structural and functional connectivity patterns of the three stages of AD (SCD, aMCI, and AD). Our experiments achieved an accuracy of 98.58% in the AD group, 97.76% in the aMCI group, and 80.24% in the SCD group. Moreover, in our experiments, we identified the most discriminating brain regions, which were mainly located in the default mode network and subcortical structures (SCS). Notably, with the development of AD pathology, SCS regions have become increasingly important, and structural connectivity has shown more discriminative power than functional connectivity. The current study may shed new light on the pathological mechanism of AD and suggests that whole-brain connectivity may provide potential effective biomarkers for the early-stage diagnosis of AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-181049

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yan, T., Wang, Y., Weng, Z., Du, W., Liu, T., Chen, D., Li, X., Wu, J., & Han, Y.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Institute of Technology (CN)
  • University of Denver (US)
  • Capital Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Yan, Tianyi
  • Han, Ying
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Published
2019-04-08
Volume
68
Issue
3
Pages
1013-1027
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W2932040306
Cited by
59
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1
FWCI
6.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, early-stage diagnosis
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Early Diagnosis, Neuroimaging, Support Vector Machine, Cognitive Dysfunction, Multimodal Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review