Cited by 194Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

Paradigm shift in NMDA receptor antagonist drug development: molecular mechanism of uncompetitive inhibition by memantine in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease and other neurologic disorders.

Lipton, Stuart A.·2005·Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia, as least in western countries. It has been estimated that the cost to society for caring for AD patients will consume the entire gross national product of the U.S.A. by the middle of this century if left unabated. Until recently, the only available drugs for this condition were cholinergic treatments, which symptomatically enhance cognitive state to some degree, but they were not neuroprotective. In fact, many potential neuroprotective drugs tested in clinical trials failed because they were poorly tolerated. However, after our discovery of its clinically-tolerated mechanism of action, one neuroprotective drug, memantine, was recently approved by the European Union and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Recent phase 3 clinical trials have shown that memantine is effective in the treatment of moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease and possibly vascular dementia (multi-infarct dementia). Here we review the molecular mechanism of memantine's action and also the basis for the drug's use in these neurological diseases, which are mediated at least in part by excitotoxicity. Excitotoxicity is defined as excessive exposure to the neurotransmitter glutamate or overstimulation of its membrane receptors, leading to neuronal injury or death. Excitotoxic neuronal cell death is mediated in part by overactivation of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA)-type glutamate receptors, which results in excessive Ca(2+) influx through the receptor's associated ion channel. Physiological NMDA receptor activity, however, is also essential for normal neuronal function. This means that potential neuroprotective agents that block virtually all NMDA receptor activity will very likely have unacceptable clinical side effects. For this reason many previous NMDA receptor antagonists have disappointingly failed advanced clinical trials for a number of neurodegenerative disorders. In contrast, studies in our laboratory have shown that the adamantane derivative, memantine, preferentially blocks excessive NMDA receptor activity without disrupting normal activity. Memantine does this through its action as an uncompetitive, low-affinity, open-channel blocker; it enters the receptor-associated ion channel preferentially when it is excessively open, and, most importantly, its off-rate is relatively fast so that it does not substantially accumulate in the channel to interfere with normal synaptic transmission. Clinical use has corroborated the prediction that memantine is thus well tolerated. Besides Alzheimer's disease, memantine is currently in trials for additional neurological disorders, including other forms of dementia, depression, glaucoma, and severe neuropathic pain. A series of second-generation memantine derivatives are currently in development and may prove to have even greater neuroprotective properties than memantine. These second-generation drugs take advantage of the fact that the NMDA receptor has other modulatory sites in addition to its ion channel that potentially could also be used for safe but effective clinical intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-2004-6s610

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Systematic reviews show donepezil, rivastigmine, and memantine have better outcomes even in severe Alzheimer's disease dementia (Stage 6) compared to placebo.

    “Systematic reviews, in addition, show donepezil, rivastigmine, and memantine have better outcomes even in severe AD dementia (Stage 6) compared to placebo.27”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lipton, S. A.
Affiliations
Scripps Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Lipton, Stuart A.
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Published
2005-01-20
Volume
6
Issue
s6
Pages
S61-S74
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W1730334876
Cited by
194
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Eye Institute (R01 EY09024, R01 EY50477, R01EY009024)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01HD29587, P01HD029587)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Keywords
memantine, NMDA receptor antagonists
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Clinical Trials as Topic, Cognition, Humans, Memantine, Models, Chemical, Necrosis, Neural Inhibition, Neurons, Calcium Channels, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Cell Death, Apoptosis, Neuroprotective Agents, Neurodegenerative Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review