The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Simvastatin is the Statin that Most Efficiently Protects Against Kainate-Induced Excitotoxicity and Memory Impairment
Abstract
Statins have recently been shown to act as protectants against several neuropathological conditions. They have received special attention in the field of Alzheimer's disease (AD), where epidemiological studies indicating a lower prevalence of AD/dementia in statin-prescribed populations. Excitotoxicity, which derives from the overstimulation of glutamate receptors, is a major cause of neuron death in several neurological diseases, including AD and epilepsy. We have carried out a comparative study to investigate the effects of all the commercially available statins (simvastatin, lovastatin, fluvastatin, pravastatin, and atorvastatin) on neuron damage and memory impairment. To this end, we studied neurodegeneration in a mouse model by systemic administration of kainate. Simvastatin was the most effective statin in reducing the deleterious effects caused by kainate, including the severity of seizures, excitotoxicity, oxidative damage, neuritic dystrophy and apoptosis in the hippocampus and other limbic structures of the brain cortex. Lovastatin was the second most efficient statin in preventing seizures and histopathological signs of excitotoxicity, whilst fluvastatin, pravastatin, and atorvastatin showed neither antiepileptic nor neuroprotective effects. Only simvastatin enhanced episodic-like memory. To the best of our knowledge this is the first in vivo study to analyze the neuroprotective effect of all the commercially available statins. Our results suggest that both simvast…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The integrated memory test has been validated in a KA-induced neurodegeneration mouse model.
“Memory status was analysed using the integrated memory test, following a procedure adapted from a previously described experiment [18] that has been validated in a KA-induced neurodegeneration mouse model [19].”
From ApoB100/LDLR-/- Hypercholesterolaemic Mice as a Model for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Neuronal Damage (2011) · cites this paper as [19]
Citations
Cites
Hippocampal damage and exploratory preferences in rats: memory for objects, places, and contexts
Mumby, D. G., Gaskin, S., Glenn, M. J., Schramek, T. E., & Lehmann, H. (2002) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.41302 · Cited by 714
Oxidative stress in the progression of Alzheimer disease in the frontal cortex
Ansari, M. A., & Scheff, S. W. (2010) · Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1097/nen.0b013e3181cb5af4 · Cited by 605
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Osterweil, E. K., Chuang, S.-C., Chubykin, A. A., Sidorov, M., Bianchi, R., Wong, R. K. S., & Bear, M. F. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.01.034 · Cited by 230
Age-dependent rescue by simvastatin of Alzheimer’s disease cerebrovascular and memory deficits
Tong, X.-K., Lecrux, C., & Hamel, E. (2012) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0169-12.2012 · Cited by 160
Ramírez, C., Sierra, S., Tercero, I., Vázquez, J. A., Pineda, A., Manrique, T., & Burgos, J. S. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022712 · Cited by 31
Self-citationLovastatin, Not Simvastatin, Corrects Core Phenotypes in the Fragile X Mouse Model
Muscas, M., Louros, S. R., & Osterweil, E. K. (2019) · eneuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0097-19.2019 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramirez, C., Tercero, I., Pineda, A., & Burgos, J. S.
- Affiliations
- NEURON BPh, BioPharma Division, Parque Tecnológico de Ciencias de la Salud, Edif. BIC-Granada, Armilla, Granada, Spain
- Venue
- Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-03-29
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 161-174
- ISSN
- 1875-8908
- 1387-2877
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review