Cited by 18Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Meta-Analysis of Variations in Association between APOE ɛ4 and Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias Across Hispanic Regions of Origin

Open access
Huggins, Lenique K.L., Min, Se Hee, Kaplan, Samantha, Wei, Jingkai, Welsh-Bohmer, Kathleen, Xu, Hanzhang·2023·Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract

Background: Emerging research has shown racial and ethnic variations in the magnitude of association between the apolipoprotein ɛ4 (APOE ɛ4) allele and the risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD). Studies researching this association among Hispanic groups within and outside of the United States have produced inconsistent results. Objective: To examine the association between the APOE ɛ4 allele and the risk of developing ADRD in global Hispanic populations from different ethnic regions of origin. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and PsycInfo were searched for studies relating to Hispanic/Latin American origin, APOE ɛ4, and ADRD. Odds ratios (OR) of ADRD risk for individuals with APOE ɛ4 versus those without APOE ɛ4 were extracted and calculated using random effects analysis. Results: 20 eligible studies represented Caribbean Hispanic, Mexican, South American, Spanish, and Cuban groups. Overall, APOE ɛ4 was significantly associated with increased risk of ADRD (Odds Ratio [OR] 3.80, 95% CI: 2.38–6.07). The association was only significant in the South American (OR: 4.61, 95% CI: 2.74–7.75) subgroup. Conclusion: There was an association between APOE ɛ4 and increased ADRD risk for the South American subgroup. The strength of this association varied across Hispanic subgroups. Data is limited with more studies especially needed for adjusted analysis on Spanish, Central American, Cuban Hispanic, and Caribbean Hispanic groups. Results suggest additional environmental or genetic risk factors are associated with ethnic variations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-221167

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The degree of risk and protection afforded by E4 and E2 respectively vary according to ancestry.

    “First, the degree of risk and protection afforded by E4 and E2 respectively vary according to ancestry1,59–62.”

    From APOE4 to APOE2 allelic switching in mice improves Alzheimer’s disease-related metabolic signatures, neuropathology and cognition (2025) · cites this paper as [60]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that the association between APOE ε4 and dementia risk varies across Hispanic groups and discusses genetic ancestry as a possible explanation. The Results (page unavailable) say the analysis focused on ε4 carriers; although ε2 genotypes are listed, the paper does not establish that ε2’s protective effect varies by ancestry. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [3]Tang MX, Stern Y, Marder K, Bell K, Gurland B, Lantigua R, Andrews H, Feng L, Tycko B, Mayeux R (1998) The APOE-ϵ4 Allele and the Risk of Alzheimer Disease Among African Americans, Whites, and Hispanics. JAMA 279, 751– 755. 9508150
  2. [27]Allegri RF, Chrem Mendez P, Russo MJ, Cohen G, Calandri I, Campos J, Nahas F, Surace E, Vazquez S, Sevlever G (2021) Biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease in mild cognitive impairment: Experience in a memory clinic from Latin America. Neurol Barc Spain. 36, 201– 208. 29636288

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huggins, L. K. L., Min, S. H., Kaplan, S., Wei, J., Welsh-Bohmer, K., & Xu, H.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
Huggins, Lenique K.L.
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Published
2023-05-30
Volume
93
Issue
3
Pages
1095-1109
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W4376116593
Cited by
18
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Alzheimer's Association
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG072958)
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (U54MD012530)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
APOE ε4, Alzheimer's disease and related dementias
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Dementia, Genotype, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Racial Groups, Apolipoprotein E4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review