The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The relation between fornix injury and memory impairment in patients with diffuse axonal injury: A diffusion tensor imaging study
Abstract
Little is known about the relation between fornix injury and memory impairment in diffuse axonal injury (DAI). In the current study, we attempted to investigate fornix injury in patients with memory impairment following DAI, using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Nine patients with DAI and nine age-and sex-matched control subjects were recruited. The DTIs were acquired using a sensitivity-encoding head coil on a 1.5 T. Five regions of interest (ROI) were drawn manually on a color fractional anisotropy (FA) map: two ROIs for each column, one ROI for the body, and two ROIs for each crus. The FA and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were measured in each of the ROIs. Cognitive function was evaluated using the Memory Assessment Scale, Wechsler Intelligence Scale, and Mini-Mental State Exam. In the DAI group, the FA value in the fornix body was significantly decreased compared with that of the control group. In contrast, we did not find significant differences in the column and crus of the fornix. Among all of the cognitive function scales, only the Memory Assessment Scale scores were significantly correlated with the FA values of the fornix body in the DAI group. We found that memory impairment in patients with DAI is closely related to neuronal injury of the fornix body among the three fornix regions that we assessed. DTI could be useful in the evaluation of patients with memory impairment following DAI.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Accordingly, diffusion anisotropy has been used for evaluation of the extent of fiber change in white matter (Chang et al., 2010; Puig et al., 2010).”
From The Ascending Reticular Activating System from Pontine Reticular Formation to the Thalamus in the Human Brain (2013) · cites this paper as Chang et al., 2010
Citations
Cites
Aggleton, J. P. (2000) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/123.4.800 · Cited by 231
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yeo, S. S., Chang, P. H., & Jang, S. H. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00416 · Cited by 162
Self-citationChoi, G., Kwak, S., Lee, H., & Chang, M. (2018) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.2340/16501977-2321 · Cited by 51
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chang, M. C., Kim, S. H., Kim, O. L., Bai, D. S., & Jang, S. H.
- Affiliations
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Republic of Korea
- Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine Yeungnam University, Republic of Korea
- Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine Yeungnam University, Republic of Korea
- Venue
- NeuroRehabilitation: An International, Interdisciplinary Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-06-11
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 347-353
- ISSN
- 1053-8135
- 1878-6448
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The relation between fornix injury and memory impairment in patients with diffuse axonal injury: A diffusion tensor imaging study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3233/nre-2010-0572
- The paper
- Chang, M. C., Kim, S. H., Kim, O. L., Bai, D. S., & Jang, S. H. (2010). The relation between fornix injury and memory impairment in patients with diffuse axonal injury: A diffusion tensor imaging study. NeuroRehabilitation: An International, Interdisciplinary Journal. https://doi.org/10.3233/nre-2010-0572