Cited by 21Workplace Health and Well-beingMedical Practices and RehabilitationOccupational Health and Safety in Workplaces

Perceptions of the work environment among people with experience of long term sick leave

Open access
Ekbladh, Elin·2010·Work

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aims were to describe and analyze how people with experience of long term sick leave perceive that factors in their work environment support or interfere with work performance, satisfaction, and well-being. METHOD: The 53 participants were interviewed with the Work Environment Impact Scale (WEIS). The WEIS ratings and belonging notes were analyzed by descriptive statistics and qualitative analysis respectively. Differences in WEIS ratings between; women and men; participants with somatic and mental diseases; and participants working and on full-time sick leave were tested. RESULTS: The most supportive factors concerned social interactions at work, and the value and meaning of work. The factors perceived as most interfering concerned work demands and rewards. The social relations at work were perceived as more supportive by the working group than by those on full-time sick leave. The participants with somatic diseases perceived physical work factors as more interfering than did participants with mental diseases, who in turn perceived the value and meaning of work as more interfering. CONCLUSION: Knowledge about the interaction between the worker and the work environment could reveal useful information about the complex phenomenon of reducing sick leave. The WEIS seems useful in providing information about how alterations and accommodations in the work environment could support individual workers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/wor-2010-0964

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ekbladh, E.
Affiliations
Linköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
Ekbladh, Elin
Venue
Work
Published
2010
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
125-136
ISSN
1051-9815 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1814700524
Cited by
21
References
31
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Work (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DiVA (Linkoping University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
Keywords
long-term sick leave, work environment, employee performance, job satisfaction, well-being, workplace relationships, job demands, work rewards, somatic diseases, mental illness, gender differences, sick leave reduction, workplace accommodations
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Attitude, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Social Support, Somatoform Disorders, Sweden, Workplace, Sick Leave

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review