Cited by 15Disability Education and EmploymentDisability Rights and RepresentationEmployment and Welfare Studies

COVID-19 related factors affecting the experiences of neurodivergent persons in the workplace: a rapid review

Open access
Mellifont, Damian·2022·Work

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic offer possibilities to advance social justice. One such prospect is to make workplaces more inclusive of neurodivergence. OBJECTIVE: This research addresses the question of, in what ways might COVID-19 affect the experiences of neurodivergent persons in the workplace? METHODS: Conducting a rapid review, the author has applied thematic analysis to a total of 50 documents comprised of journal articles, news articles, and guides as retrieved from purposive searches of ProQuest Central, ProQuest Newsstream International, Google Scholar, and Google databases. RESULTS: Research results have revealed themes of challenges and opportunities, and sub-themes of accommodating (i.e., remote working, employee recruitment, retainment or advancement and/or access); and diversity and inclusion (i.e., acceptance, empathy and/or ERGs). CONCLUSION: This study has informed a baseline COVID-19-related guide to accommodating and including neurodivergence in the workplace. The review concludes by offering possibilities as to what a COVID-19 inspired 'new normal' might mean for supporting neurodivergent staff (and prospective staff).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/wor-210811

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One rapid review focussed mostly on news articles rather than research studies.

    “One rapid review focussed mostly on news articles rather than research studies [22].”
  • Two previous reviews explored the impact of COVID-19 and the associated change in working practices for neuro-divergent workers but found little relevant primary data.

    “Two previous reviews explored the impact of COVID-19 and the associated change in working practices for neuro-divergent workers [22,23] but found little relevant primary data.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Faragher J. Are employers losing out on skills of people with autism? Occupational Health & Wellbeing. 2018;70(5): 16-7.
  2. Davila J, Shectman A, Anandan R. Making Agile More Inclusive. Software Quality Professional. 2020;23(1): 23-31.
  3. Sutherland A. Time to celebrate neurodiversity in the workplace. Occupational Health & Wellbeing. 2016; 68(11):11.
  4. Koh HK, Geller AC, VanderWeele TJ. Deaths from COVID- 19. JAMA. 2021;325(2):133-4.
  5. Kumar R. Supporting well-being in resource-scarce envi- ronments [Blogs]. Blogs (The Times of India Online Edition and The Economic Times Online Edition). 2020 Aug 04.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mellifont, D.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Mellifont, Damian
Venue
Work
Published
2022-01-15
Volume
71
Issue
1
Pages
3-12
ISSN
  • 1051-9815 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-9270
OpenAlex
W4200342190
Cited by
15
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3
FWCI
3.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Work (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
Keywords
neurodivergence, COVID-19 pandemic, workplace inclusion, workplace accommodations, remote work, personnel selection, employee retention, employee career advancement, employee resource groups, workplace diversity and inclusion, social justice, new normal
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Humans, Prospective Studies, Workplace, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review