Cited by 100Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Implementing an Advance Care Planning Program in German Nursing Homes

Open access
in der Schmitten, Jürgen, Lex, Katharina, Mellert, Christine, Rothärmel, Sonja, Wegscheider, Karl, Marckmann, Georg·2014·Deutsches Ärzteblatt international

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advance Care Planning (ACP) is a systematic approach to ensure that effective advance directives (ADs) are developed and respected. We studied the effects of implementing a regional ACP program in Germany. METHODS: In a prospective, inter-regionally controlled trial focusing on nursing homes (n/hs), we compared the number, relevance and validity of new ADs completed in the intervention region versus the control region. Intervention n/h residents and their families were offered professional facilitation including standardized documentation. RESULTS: Data from 136 residents of three intervention n/hs were compared with data from 439 residents of 10 control n/hs over a study period of 16.5 months. In the intervention region, 49 (36.0%) participating residents completed a new AD over the period of the study, compared to 18 (4.1%) in the control region; these ADs included 30 ADs by proxy in the intervention region versus 10 in the control region. Proxies were designated in 94.7% versus 50.0% of cases, the AD was signed by a physician in 93.9% versus 16.7%, and an emergency order was included in 98.0% versus 44.4%. Resuscitation status was addressed in 95.9% versus 38.9% of cases (p<0.01 for all of the differences mentioned above). In the intervention region, new ADs were preceded by an average of 2.5 facilitated conversations (range, 2–5) with a mean total duration of 100 minutes (range, 60–240 minutes). CONCLUSION: The implementation of an ACP program in German nursing homes led, much more frequently than previously reported, to the creation of advance directives with potential relevance to medical decision-making. Future research should assess the effect of such programs on clinical and structural outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0050

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [2]Kutner L. Due process of euthanasia: the living will, a proposal. Indiana Law J. 1969 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. [9]Höfling W. Das neue Patientenverfügungsgesetz. NJW. 2009;62 [Google Scholar]
  3. [11]Hammes B. Update on Respecting Choices four years on. Innovations in End-of-Life Care. 2003;5 [Google Scholar]
  4. [19]Bühler E, Stolz K. Das neue Gesetz zu Patientenverfügungen in der Praxis. BtPrax. 2009 [Google Scholar]
  5. [23]Marckmann G, Sanktjohanser AM, in der Schmitten J. Sterben im Spannungsfeld zwischen Ethik und Ökonomie. In: Bormann FJ, Borasio G, editors. Sterben Dimensionen eines anthropologischen Grundphänomens. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter Verlag; 2012. pp. 351–367. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
in der Schmitten, J., Lex, K., Mellert, C., Rothärmel, S., Wegscheider, K., & Marckmann, G.
Affiliations
University of Bonn (DE)
Venue
Deutsches Ärzteblatt international
Published
2014-01-24
Volume
111
Issue
4
Pages
50-7
ISSN
1866-0452 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W310256205
Cited by
100
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4
FWCI
10.28
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
Locations
  • Deutsches Ärzteblatt international (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • B. Braun-Stiftung
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
advance care planning, advance directives, nursing homes, long-term care, proxy decision-making, resuscitation status, emergency orders, family involvement
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Germany, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Nursing Care, Nursing Homes, Patient Care Planning, Patient Education as Topic, Regional Health Planning, Terminal Care, Advance Directive Adherence, Advance Care Planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review