Cited by 282Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationSpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyPregnancy-related medical research

Non-Specific Low Back Pain

Open access
Chenot, Jean-François, Greitemann, Bernhard, Kladny, Bernd, Petzke, Frank, Pfingsten, Michael, Schorr, Susanne Gabriele·2017·Deutsches Ärzteblatt international

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For many years, low back pain has been both the leading cause of days lost from work and the leading indication for medical rehabilitation. The goal of the German Disease Management Guideline (NDMG) on nonspecific low back pain is to improve the treatment of patients with this condition. METHODS: The current update of the NDMG on non-specific low back pain is based on articles retrieved by a systematic search of the literature for systematic reviews. Its recommendations for diagnosis and treatment were developed by a collaborative effort of 29 scientific medical societies and organizations and approved in a formal consensus process. RESULTS: If the history and physical examination do not arouse any suspicion of a dangerous underlying cause, no further diagnostic evaluation is indicated for the time being. Passive, reactive measures should be taken only in combination with activating measures, or not at all. When drugs are used for symptomatic treatment, patients should be treated with the most suitable drug in the lowest possible dose and for as short a time as possible. CONCLUSION: A physician should be in charge of the overall care process. The patient should be kept well informed over the entire course of his or her illness and should be encouraged to adopt a healthful lifestyle, including regular physical exercise.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0883

Cites

135 of 135 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. [1]Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund (DRV-Bund) DRV-Bund. Berlin: 2016. Reha-Bericht Update 2016. Die medizinische und berufliche Rehabilitation der Rentenversicherung im Licht der Statistik. [Google Scholar]
  2. [2]Marschall J, Hildebrandt S, Sydow H, Nolting HD. Gesundheitsreport 2016. Analyse der Arbeitsunfähigkeitsdaten. Schwerpunkt: Gender und Gesundheit. Heidelberg: medhochzwei Verlag. 2016 [Google Scholar]
  3. [3]Raspe H. Robert Koch-Institut (RKI) RKI. Berlin: 2012. Rückenschmerzen. [Google Scholar]
  4. [4]Klauber J, Günster C, Gerste B, Robra BP. Versorgungs-Report 2013/2014. In: Schmacke N, editor. Schwerpunkt: Depression. Stuttgart Schattauer: 2014. [Google Scholar]
  5. [5]Bundesärztekammer (BÄK), Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (KBV), Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF) Nationale VersorgungsLeitlinie Nicht-spezifischer Kreuzschmerz - Langfassung, Version 1. doi.org/10.6101/AZQ/000353 (last accessed on 6 March 2017) [Google Scholar] · DOI
  6. [6]Bundesärztekammer (BÄK), Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (KBV) Beurteilungskriterien für Leitlinien in der medizinischen Versorgung - Beschlüsse der Vorstände der Bundesärztekammer und Kassenärztlicher Bundesvereinigung, Juni 1997. Dtsch Arztebl. 1997;94:A2154–A-2155. [Google Scholar]
  7. [7]Deutsche Schmerzgesellschaft. Langzeitanwendung von Opioiden bei nicht tumorbedingten Schmerzen - „LONTS“. www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/145-003.html (last accessed on 17 March 2016) [Google Scholar]
  8. [22]Arzneimittelkommission der deutschen Ärzteschaft (AkdÄ) Agranulozytose nach Metamizol - sehr selten, aber häufiger als gedacht. Dtsch Arztebl. 2011;108 [Google Scholar]
  9. [24]Wörz R, Bolten W, Heller B, Krainick JU, Pergande G. Flupirtin im Vergleich zu Chlormezanon und Plazebo bei chronischen muskulöskelettalen Rückenschmerzen Ergebnisse einer multizentrischen randomisierten Doppelblindstudie. Fortschr Med. 1996;114:500–504. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. [33]European Medicines Agency (EMA) PRAC recommends restricting the use of flupirtine-containing medicines. Committee also recommends weekly monitoring of patients‘ liver function. EMA/362055/2013. www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/ (last accessed on 17 March 2016) [Google Scholar]
  11. E1.Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF) Zuckschwerdt. München: 2012. Das AWMF-Regelwerk Leitlinien. [Google Scholar]
  12. E2.Ärztliches Zentrum für Qualität in der Medizin (ÄZQ), Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF) Deutsches Instrument zur methodischen Leitlinien-Bewertung (DELBI). Fassung 2005/2006 + Domäne 8. www.leitlinien.de/mdb/edocs/pdf/literatur/delbi-fassung-2005-2006-domaene-8-2008.pdf (last accessed on 26 June 2017 [Google Scholar]
  13. E3.Bundesärztekammer (BÄK) Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (KBV), Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF) Nationales Programm für VersorgungsLeitlinien. Methoden-Report 4. edition. www.leitlinien.de/mdb/downloads/nvl/methodik/mr-aufl-4-version-1.pdf (last accessed on 26 June 2017 [Google Scholar]
  14. E52.Arzneimittelkommission der deutschen Ärzteschaft (AkdÄ) Empfehlungen zur Therapie von Kreuzschmerzen. www.akdae.de/Arzneimitteltherapie/TE/A-Z/PDF/Kreuzschmerz.pdf#page=1&view=fitB (last accessed on 20 April 2017) (3) [Google Scholar]
  15. E54.Kempf HD, editor. Verl. Heidelberg Springer Med: 2010. Die neue Rückenschule. Das Praxisbuch. [Google Scholar]
  16. E65.Rasmussen GG. Manipulation in treatment of low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. Man Med. 1979;1:8–10. [Google Scholar]
  17. E67.Sweetman BJ, Heinrich I, Anderson JAD. A randomized controlled trial of exercises, short wave diathermy, and traction for low back pain, with evidence of diagnosis-related response to treatment. J Orthop Rheumatol. 1993;6:159–166. [Google Scholar]
  18. E75.Ehrenbrusthoff K, Ryan CG, Schofield PA, Martin DJ. Physical therapy management of older adults with chronic low back pain: a systematic review. J Pain Manag. 2012;5:317–329. [Google Scholar]
  19. E79.Leitliniengruppe Hessen, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Allgemeinmedizin und Familienmedizin (DEGAM), PMV forschungsgruppe, Ärztliches Zentrum für Qualität in der Medizin (ÄZQ) Hausärztliche Leitlinie Multimedikation. Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Multimedikation bei Erwachsenen und geriatrischen Patienten, Version 1.05. www.aezq.de/mdb/edocs/pdf/schriftenreihe/schriftenreihe41.pdf (last accessed on 9 November 2017) (1) [Google Scholar]
  20. E80.Holt A, Schmiedl S, Thürmann PA. Priscus-Liste potenziell inadäquater Medikation für ältere Menschens. www.priscus.net/download/PRISCUS-Liste_PRISCUS-TP3_2011.pdf (last accessed on 9 November 2017) [Google Scholar]
  21. E81.Institut für Experimentelle und Klinische Pharmakologie, Zentrum für Gerontopharmakologie, Abteilung für Medizinische Statistik BuI. Pazan F, eiß C, Wehling M. Die Forta-Liste.“Fit for the Aged“. Expert Consensus Validation 2015. www.umm.uni-heidelberg.de/ag/forta/FORTA_Liste_2015_deutsche_Version.pdf (last accessed on 9 November 2017) [Google Scholar]
  22. E104.Abholz HH, Bewig A. Pille oder Spritze? Untersuchung zur Frage eines Unterschieds am Beispiel des akuten Rückenschmerzes. ZFA. 2001;77:31–35. [Google Scholar]
  23. E105.Brune K, Lanz B. Bonta M, Bray MA, Parnham MJ, editors. Pharmacokinetics of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Handbook of inflammation; 5. Edinburgh: Elsevier. 1985:413–449. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chenot, J.-F., Greitemann, B., Kladny, B., Petzke, F., Pfingsten, M., & Schorr, S. G.
Affiliations
  • Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (DE)
  • Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund (DE)
  • Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE)
  • German Agency for Quality in Medicine (DE)
Venue
Deutsches Ärzteblatt international
Published
2017-12-25
Volume
114
Issue
51-52
Pages
883-890
ISSN
1866-0452 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2801155169
Cited by
282
References
135
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2013: 5
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
Locations
  • Deutsches Ärzteblatt international (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Andrew W. Mellon Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy-related medical research
Keywords
non-specific low back pain, disease management guidelines, diagnosis, treatment guidelines, conservative treatment, pharmacotherapy, physical activity, patient information, health promotion
MeSH terms
Exercise Therapy, Germany, Humans, Lumbar Vertebrae, Prospective Studies, Low Back Pain, Practice Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review