Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The challenges of public sector communication in the face of the pandemic crisis: professional roles, competencies and platformization1

Ducci, Gea, Lovari, Alessandro·2021·SOCIOLOGIA DELLA COMUNICAZIONE
DOI 10.3280/sc2021-061002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The pandemic crisis has led to a renew centrality of public sector communica-tion in a hybrid and convergent media ecosystems aiming at (re)building relation-ships based on trust between institutions and citizens. This contribution reflects on the strengths and fragility of the Italian public communication in the face of the pandemic, considering regulatory processes and paths of professionalization. It focuses also on the challenges of social media use in public sector, suggesting a critical approach towards the platformization of the public sector communication activities. The last part of this manuscript presents the different articles that com-pose the special issue.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3280/sc2021-061002

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Bowen S. A. (2013), Using classic social media cases to distill ethical guidelines for digital engagement, in «Journal of Mass Media Ethics: Exploring Questions of Media Morality», 28(2), pp. 119-133. · DOI
  2. Canel M.J., V. Luoma-aho (eds) (2019), Public Sector Communication, Wiley Blackwell, New York. · doi:10.1002/9781119263203
  3. Bessières D. (2018), L’hybridité: une composante ancienne mais aujourd’hui démultipliée de la communication publique, in «Recherches en Communication», 47, 5-21. · doi:10.14428/rec.v47i47.45513
  4. Boccia Artieri G., Marinelli A. (2018), Piattaforme, algoritmi, formati. Come sta evolvendo l’informazione online, in «Problemi dell’informazione», 43(3), pp. 349-368.
  5. Chadwick A. (2013), The hybrid media system. Politics and power, Oxford University Press, Oxford-New York. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Criado I.J., Rojas-Martin F., Gil-Garcia R.J. (2017), Enacting social media success in local public administrations: an empirical analysis of organizational, institutional and contextual factors, in «International Journal of Public Sector Management», 30, 1, pp. 2-14. · DOI
  7. Dahlgren P. (2009), Media and Political Engagement. Citizens, Communication and Democracy, Cambridge University Press, New York.
  8. D’Ambrosi L., Massoli L. (2014), Environmental Movements, Institutions and Civil Society: A New Way to Preserve Common Goods, in «Partecipazione e Conflitto», n.7, pp. 657-681.
  9. Ducci G., Materassi L., Solito L. (2020), Re-Connecting Scholars’ Voices: An historical Review of Public Communication in Italy and New Challenges in the Open Government Framework, in «Partecipazione e conflitto», 13(2), pp. 1062-1084.
  10. Ducci G., Lovari A., D’Ambrosi L. (2019), Fra schermi e schermaglie: le sfide del visual nello storytelling istituzionale, in «H-Ermes. Journal of Communication», 15, pp. 313-352.
  11. Faccioli F., D’Ambrosi L., Ducci G., Lovari A. (2020), #DistantiMaUniti: la comunicazione pubblica tra innovazioni e fragilità alla ricerca di una ridefinizione, in «H-Ermes. Journal of Communication», 17, pp. 27-72.
  12. Gillespie T. (2018), Custodians of the Internet. Platform, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media, Yale University Press, London. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Helmond A. (2015), The platformization of the web: making web data platform ready, in «Social Media + Society», pp. 1-11. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Jenkins H., S. Ford S., and J. Green (2013), Spreadable media. Creating value and meaning in a networked culture, New York University Press, New York.
  15. Lovari A., Righetti N. (2020), La comunicazione pubblica della salute tra infodemia e fake news: il ruolo del Ministero della Salute nella sfida social al COVID-19, in «Mediascapes Journal», 15, pp. 156-173.
  16. Lovari A., Valentini C. (2020), Public Sector Communication and Social Media. Opportunities and Limits of Current Policies, Activities, and Practices, in V. Luoma-aho, M.J. Canel (eds.), Handbook of Public Sector Communication, Wiley Blackwell, New York, pp. 315-328. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Luoma-aho L., Canel M.J. (2020), Handbook of Public Sector Communication, Wiley Blackwell, New York. · doi:10.1002/9781119263203
  18. Solito L. (2018), Comunicazione istituzionale e società digitale. Un nuovo ruolo per i comunicatori pubblici, in «Comunicazione Politica», 3. pp. 393-412.
  19. Sorice, M. (2020), La «piattaformizzazione» della sfera pubblica, in «Comunicazione politica», 21(3), pp. 371-388.
  20. van Dijck J. (2020), Governing digital societies: private platforms, public values, in «Computer Law & Security Review», pp. 1-4. · DOI
  21. Zavattaro S.M., Sementelli A.J. (2014), A critical examination of social media adoption in government: introducing omnipresence, in «Government Information Quarterly», 31, pp. 257-64. · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Ducci, G., & Lovari, A.
Venue
SOCIOLOGIA DELLA COMUNICAZIONE
Publisher
Franco Angeli
Published
2021-07
Issue
61
Pages
9-19
ISSN
  • 1121-1733
  • 1972-4926
DOI
10.3280/sc2021-061002
Cited by
3
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.