The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beyond Access and Barriers: Inclusive Education and Systems Change
Open accessAbstract
In this introduction to the special issue, we argue that inclusive education research should move beyond a traditional 'deficit' approach, rooted in special education. The articles contained in this special issue represent new ways of conceptualizing, researching, and exploring inclusivity in education. In sum, this special issue makes the case that inclusivity in education requires a complex systems approach of analysis and advocacy that recognizes multiple layers, actors, and sites. Specifically, any way of understanding inclusivity in education needs to foreground participants, practitioners, and end-users. We believe that new ways of researching and conceputalizing inclusivty in education also fits into current trends in international and comparative education.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Existing open-education resources for using Six Bricks® in a Foundation Phase classroom focused on mainstream activities related to the national curriculum in numeracy, literacy and life skills kills (Mpu & Adu, 2021;Schuelka et al., 2020).”
From Using LEGO® Six Bricks® as an educational resource to address challenges pre-service teachers face during school-based teaching practice (2025) · cites this paper as Schuelka et al., 2020
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Public Goods, Private Goods: The American Struggle Over Educational Goals
Labaree, D. F. (1997) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312034001039 · Cited by 1,197
Making all the difference: inclusion, exclusion, and American law
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-4166 · Cited by 1,050
The Irregular School: Exclusion, Schooling and Inclusive Education
Slee, R. (2011) · Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) · Cited by 471
Rethinking Case Study Research: A Comparative Approach
Bartlett, L., & Vavrus, F. (2016) · Cited by 321
Inclusive Education isn’t Dead, it Just Smells Funny
Slee, R. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429486869 · Cited by 255
Special Educational Needs: A New Look
Warnock, M. (2008) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789087903039_004 · Cited by 235
Inclusive Education: International Policy & Practice
Armstrong, A. C., Armstrong, D., & Spandagou, I. (2010) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446221990 · Cited by 143
Inclusive Education: International policy and practice
Kalyanpur, M. (2011) · International Journal of Disability Development and Education · doi:10.1080/1034912x.2011.547360 · Cited by 107
Special Educational Needs : A New Look
(2010) · Bloomsbury Academic eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781472541284 · Cited by 83
Comparing Special Education: Origins to Contemporary Paradoxes
Richardson, J. G., & Powell, J. J. W. (2011) · Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) · Cited by 70
Cited by
Approaches to decolonising forensic curricula
Chaussée, A., Winter, J., & Ayres, P. (2022) · Science & Justice · doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2022.06.003 · Cited by 23
A Review Study of Research Articles on the Barriers to Inclusive Education in Primary Schools
Kurowski, M., Černý, M., & Trapl, F. (2022) · Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science · doi:10.7160/eriesj.2022.150206 · Cited by 21
Meki-Kombe, C., & Mtonga, D. E. (2021) · Journal of Student Affairs in Africa · doi:10.24085/jsaa.v9i1.1426 · Cited by 20
El bullying en el marco de la escuela inclusiva: revisión sistemática
Jiménez, G. G., Otero, L. M. R., & García, P. S. (2021) · Páginas de Educación · doi:10.22235/pe.v14i1.2258 · Cited by 12
Learning in the shadow of eugenics: Why segregated schooling persists in Australia
de Bruin, K. (2022) · Australian Journal of Education · doi:10.1177/00049441221127765 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Schuelka, M. J., Braun, A. M. B., & Johnstone, C. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Birmingham (GB)
- University of South Florida (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Venue
- FIRE: Forum for International Research in Education
- Publisher
- Texas Tech University
- Published
- 2020-01-08
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2326-3873 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3004642875
- Cited by
- 88
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 72 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 3.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- FIRE Forum for International Research in Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- ThinkTech (Texas Tech University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of State
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Inclusive Education and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Education › Education Pedagogy and Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
- Keywords
- inclusive education, systemic change, deficit approach, special education, complex systems approach, end-user perspective
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
