The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dietary assessment methods: dietary records.
Abstract
Dietary records or food diaries can be highlighted among dietary assessment methods of the current diet for their interest and validity. It is a prospective, open-ended survey method collecting data about the foods and beverages consumed over a previously specified period of time. Dietary records can be used to estimate current diet of individuals and population groups, as well as to identify groups at risk of inadequacy. It is a dietary assessment method interesting for its use in epidemiological or in clinical studies. High validity and precision has been reported for the method when used following adequate procedures and considering the sufficient number of days. Thus, dietary records are often considered as a reference method in validation studies. Nevertheless, the method is affected by error and has limitations due mainly to the tendency of subjects to report food consumption close to those socially desirable. Additional problems are related to the high burden posed on respondents. The method can also influence food behavior in respondents in order to simplify the registration of food intake and some subjects can experience difficulties in writing down the foods and beverages consumed or in describing the portion sizes. Increasing the number of days observed reduces the quality of completed diet records. It should also be considered the high cost of coding and processing information collected in diet records. One of the main advantages of the method is the registration of the foods and beverages as consumed, thus reducing the problem of food omissions due to memory failure. Weighted food records provide more precise estimates of consumed portions. New Technologies can be helpful to improve and ease collaboration of respondents, as well as precision of the estimates, although it would be desirable to evaluate the advantages and limitations in order to optimize the implementation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New technology in dietary assessment: a review of digital methods in improving food record accuracy
Stumbo, P. J. (2013) · Proceedings of the Nutrition Society · doi:10.1017/s0029665112002911 · Cited by 146
Cited by
Corley, B. T., Carroll, R. W., Hall, R. M., Weatherall, M., Parry‐Strong, A., & Krebs, J. D. (2018) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/dme.13595 · Cited by 217
Mills, S., Candow, D. G., Forbes, S. C., Neary, J. P., Ormsbee, M. J., & Antonio, J. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12061880 · Cited by 63
Monitoring Energy Balance in Breast Cancer Survivors Using a Mobile App: Reliability Study
Lozano-Lozano, M., Galiano-Castillo, N., Martín-Martín, L., Pace-Bedetti, N., Fernández-Lao, C., Arroyo-Morales, M., & Cantarero-Villanueva, I. (2018) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.9669 · Cited by 37
Nunes, C. L., Matias, C. N., Santos, D. A., Morgado, J. P., Monteiro, C. P., Sousa, M., Minderico, C. S., Rocha, P. M., St-Onge, M.-P., Sardinha, L. B., et al. (2018) · Medicina · doi:10.3390/medicina54030041 · Cited by 36
Achieving an optimal fat loss phase in resistance-trained athletes: a narrative review
Ruiz-Castellano, C., Espinar, S., Contreras, C., Mata, F., Aragon, A. A., & Martínez-Sanz, J. M. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu13093255 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Anta, R. M. O., Pérez‐Rodrigo, C., & López-Sobaler, A. M.
- Venue
- PubMed
- Publisher
- National Institutes of Health
- Published
- 2015-02-26
- Volume
- 31 Suppl 3
- Pages
- 38-45
- OpenAlex
- W1603539037
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dietary assessment methods: dietary records. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3305/nh.2015.31.sup3.8749
- The paper
- Anta, R. M. O., Pérez‐Rodrigo, C., & López-Sobaler, A. M. (2015). Dietary assessment methods: dietary records. PubMed. https://doi.org/10.3305/nh.2015.31.sup3.8749
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.