Cited by 146Nutritional Studies and DietMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

New technology in dietary assessment: a review of digital methods in improving food record accuracy

Open access
Stumbo, Phyllis J.·2013·Proceedings of the Nutrition Society

Abstract

Methods for conducting dietary assessment in the United States date back to the early twentieth century. Methods of assessment encompassed dietary records, written and spoken dietary recalls, FFQ using pencil and paper and more recently computer and internet applications. Emerging innovations involve camera and mobile telephone technology to capture food and meal images. This paper describes six projects sponsored by the United States National Institutes of Health that use digital methods to improve food records and two mobile phone applications using crowdsourcing. The techniques under development show promise for improving accuracy of food records.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0029665112002911

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Medlin C & Skinner JD (1988) 50 year review of individual methods. J Am Dietetic Assoc 88, 1250.
  2. Noronha J, Hysen E, Zhang H et al. (2011) PlateMate: Crowdsourcing nutrition analysis from food photographs. In: UIST Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 1-12, doi:10.1145/2047196.2047198, available at https:wiki.engr. illinois.edu/download/attachments/181174324/noronha-plate mate-uist11-small.pdf. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stumbo, P. J.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Stumbo, Phyllis J.
Venue
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society
Published
2013-01-21
Volume
72
Issue
1
Pages
70-76
ISSN
  • 0029-6651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2719
OpenAlex
W2028292653
Cited by
146
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2
FWCI
13.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of The Nutrition Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
dietary assessment, food diary, dietary recall, food frequency questionnaire, digital technologies, mobile application, crowdsourcing
MeSH terms
Diet, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Photography, Technology, United States, Nutrition Assessment, Diet Records, Cell Phone, Crowdsourcing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review