CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 431Chronic Disease Management StrategiesDiabetes Management and EducationHealth Policy Implementation Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 275 of the 279 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A rapid synthesis of the evidence on interventions supporting self-management for people with long-term conditions: PRISMS – Practical systematic RevIew of Self-Management Support for long-term conditions

Open access
Taylor, Stephanie JC, Pinnock, Hilary, Epiphaniou, Eleni, Pearce, Gemma, Parke, Hannah L, Schwappach, Anna, Purushotham, Neetha, Jacob, Sadhana, Griffiths, Chris J, Greenhalgh, Trisha, Sheikh, Aziz·2014·Health Services and Delivery Research
DOI 10.3310/hsdr02530
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Background Despite robust evidence concerning self-management for some long-term conditions (LTCs), others lack research explicitly on self-management and, consequently, some patient groups may be overlooked. Aim To undertake a rapid, systematic overview of the evidence on self-management support for LTCs to inform health-care commissioners and providers about what works, for whom, and in what contexts. Methods Self-management is ‘the tasks . . . individuals must undertake to live with one or more chronic conditions . . . [including] . . . having the confidence to deal with medical management, role management and emotional management of their conditions’. We convened an expert workshop and identified characteristics of LTCs potentially of relevance to self-management and 14 diverse exemplar LTCs (stroke, asthma, type 2 diabetes mellitus, depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, dementia, epilepsy, hypertension, inflammatory arthropathies, irritable bowel syndrome, low back pain, progressive neurological disorders and type 1 diabetes mellitus). For each LTC we conducted systematic overviews of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of self-management support interventions (‘quantitative meta-reviews’); and systematic overviews of systematic reviews of qualitative studies of patients’ experiences relating to self-management (‘qualitative meta-reviews’). We also conducted an original systematic review of implementation studies of self-management support in the LTCs. We synthesised all our data considering the different characteristics of LTCs. In parallel, we developed a taxonomy of the potential components of self-management support. Results We included 30 qualitative systematic reviews (including 515 unique studies), 102 quantitative systematic reviews (including 969 RCTs), and 61 studies in the implementation systematic review. Effective self-management support interventions are multifaceted, should be tailored to the individual, their culture and beliefs, a specific LTC and position on the disease trajectory, and underpinned by a collaborative/communicative relationship between the patient and health-care professional (HCP) within the context of a health-care organisation that actively promotes self-management. Self-management support is a complex intervention and although many components were described and trialled in the studies no single component stood out as more important than any other. Core components include (1) provision of education about the LTC, recognising the importance of understanding patients’ pre-existing knowledge and beliefs about their LTC; (2) psychological strategies to support adjustment to life with a LTC; (3) strategies specifically to support adherence to treatments; (4) practical support tailored to the specific LTC, including support around activities of daily living for disabling conditions, action plans in conditions subject to marked exacerbations, intensive disease-specific training to enable self-management of specific clinical tasks; and (5) social support as appropriate. Implementation requires a whole-systems approach which intervenes at the level of the patient, the HCP and the organisation. The health-care organisation is responsible for providing the means (both training and time/material resources) to enable HCPs to implement, and patients to benefit from, self-management support, regularly evaluating self-management processes and clinical outcomes. More widely there is a societal need to address public understanding of LTCs. The lack of public story for many conditions impacted on patient help-seeking behaviour and public perceptions of need. Conclusions Supporting self-management is inseparable from the high-quality care for LTCs. Commissioners and health-care providers should promote a culture of actively supporting self-management as a normal, expected, monitored and rewarded aspect of care. Further research is needed to understand how health service managers and staff can achieve this culture change in their health-care organisations. Study registration This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42012002898. Funding The National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3310/hsdr02530

Cites

275 of 275 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 279 references

4 of the 279 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 2007, Research Evidence on the Effectiveness of Self-Care Support (2005–07)
  2. 2002, Innovative Care for Chronic Conditions: Building Blocks for Action
  3. 2006, Our Health, Our Care, Our Say: A New Direction for Community Services
  4. 2005, Designed for Life: Creating World Class Health and Social Care for Wales in the 21st century
  5. 2008, Co-Creating Health Briefing paper
  6. 2001, The Expert Patient: A New Approach to Chronic Disease Management for the 21st Century
  7. 2010, Quality, Innovation, Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) Work-Stream for Patients with LTCs
  8. 2011, Review of National Self Care Week 15–21 November 2010
  9. 2009, Supporting People with Long Term Conditions: Commissioning Personalised Care Planning – A Guide for Commissioners
  10. 2005, Baseline Study of Activity and Development in Self Care Support in PCTs and Local Areas
  11. 2010, Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS
  12. Miles, 2010, Long-Term Conditions Care Planning Commitment
  13. Hunt, 2012, UK To Be ‘World Leader’ on Health Technology, says Hunt
  14. 2005, Self Care – A Real Choice: Self Care Support – A Practical Option
  15. Pinnock, 2008, The Process of Planning, Development and Implementation of a General Practitioner with a Special Interest Service in Primary Care Organisations in England and Wales: A Comparative Prospective Case Study
  16. Heidegger, 1962, Being and Time
  17. Glaser, 1967, The Discovery of Grounded Theory
  18. 2011, Diabetic Foot Problems – Inpatient Management (CG119)
  19. 2009, Type 2 Diabetes – Newer Agents (Partial Update of CG66)
  20. Radomski, 2008, Occupational Therapy for Physical Dysfunction
  21. Goffman, 1959, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life
  22. Leary, 1995, Self-Presentation: Impression Management and Interpersonal Behaviour
  23. 2010, Depression: The NICE Guideline on the Treatment and Management of Depression in Adults (Updated Edition)
  24. Pinnock, 2007, Accessibility, clinical effectiveness, and practice costs of providing a telephone option for routine asthma reviews: phase 4 controlled implementation study, Br J Gen Prac, 57, 714
  25. Kelly, 2005, The Good Life Club project. Telephone coaching for chronic disease self management, Aus Fam Phys, 34, 31
  26. Pinnock, Developing Standards for Reporting Phase IV Implementation Studies
  27. 2011, Alcohol-Use Disorders: Diagnosis, Assessment and Management of Harmful Drinking and Alcohol Dependence
  28. 2011, The Information Centre for Health and Social Care. Disease Prevalence. Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) for April 2010–March 2011
  29. 2006, Atrial Fibrillation: The Management of Atrial Fibrillation
  30. Rosenblatt, 2008, I Exist: The Message From Adults with Autism in England, 3
  31. 2006, Bipolar Disorder
  32. 2012, CancerStats – Key Facts
  33. 2010, Updates Advice on Cerebral Palsy Operation
  34. Clinical Knowledge Summaries. Constipation in Children
  35. 2011, Health Inequalities and Chronic Kidney Disease
  36. Emerson, 2008, CEDR Research Report 2008(1): People with Learning Disabilities in England. Working Paper

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 431

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Taylor, S. J., Pinnock, H., Epiphaniou, E., Pearce, G., Parke, H. L., Schwappach, A., Purushotham, N., Jacob, S., Griffiths, C. J., Greenhalgh, T., & Sheikh, A.
Affiliations
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Health Services and Delivery Research
Publisher
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Published
2014-12
Volume
2
Issue
53
Pages
1-580
ISSN
  • 2050-4349 (ISSN-L)
  • 2050-4357
DOI
10.3310/hsdr02530
OpenAlex
W2027619473
Cited by
431
References
279
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 3
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/non-commercial-government-licence/non-commercial-government-licence.htm (unspecified)
Locations
  • Health Services and Delivery Research (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institute for Health Research (11/1014/04)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
self-management support, chronic disease, self-management interventions, patient education, medication adherence, patient-professional relationship, patient experience, complex interventions, personalized interventions, psychological adjustment, health care organization, asthma, type 2 diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, dementia, epilepsy, irritable bowel syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review