Cited by 181Chronic Disease Management StrategiesDiabetes Management and EducationHealth Policy Implementation Science

The PRISMS taxonomy of self-management support: derivation of a novel taxonomy and initial testing of its utility

Open access
Pearce, Gemma, Parke, Hannah L, Pinnock, Hilary, Epiphaniou, Eleni, Bourne, Claire LA, Sheikh, Aziz, Taylor, Stephanie JC·2016·Journal of Health Services Research & Policy

Abstract

Background: Supporting self-management is a core response of health care systems globally to the increasing prevalence of long-term conditions. Lack of a comprehensive taxonomy (or classification) of self-management support components hinders characterization and, ultimately, understanding of these frequently complex, multi-component interventions. Objective: To develop a comprehensive, descriptive taxonomy of self-management support components. Methods: Components were derived from the 969 unique randomized controlled trials described in the 102 systematic reviews and 61 implementation trials, examining 14 diverse long-term conditions included in the Practical Reviews in Self-Management Support (PRISMS) project followed by discussion at an expert stakeholder workshop. The utility of the taxonomy was then tested using a self-management support intervention for cancer survivors. Results: The PRISMS taxonomy comprises 14 components that might be used to support self-management (e.g. information about condition/management, provision of equipment, social support), when delivered to someone with a long-term condition or their carer. Overarching dimensions are delivery mode; personnel delivering the support; intervention targeting; and intensity, frequency and duration of the intervention. The taxonomy does not consider the effectiveness or otherwise of the different components or the overarching dimensions. Conclusions: The PRISMS taxonomy offers a framework to researchers describing self-management support interventions, to reviewers synthesizing evidence and to developers of health services for people with long-term conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1355819615602725

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Adams K, Greiner AC, Corrigan JM, Eds. The 1st Annual Crossing the Quality Chasm Summit -A Focus on Communities. Washington, D.C: The National Academic Press; 2004.
  2. Thyberg I, Hass UAM, Nordenskiöld U, et al. Survey of the use and effect of assistive devices in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: A two-year followup of women and men. Arthritis & Rheumatism 2004; 51: 413-421.
  3. Adams K, Greiner AC, Corrigan JM, Eds. The 1st Annual Crossing the Quality Chasm Summit -A Focus on Communities. Washington, D.C: The National Academic Press; 2004.
  4. Kennedy A, Rogers A, Bower P. Support for self care for patients with chronic disease. BMJ 2007; 337: 968-970
  5. Kielmann T, Huby G, Powell A, et al. From support to boundary: a qualitative study of the border between self-care and professional care. Pat Ed Counsel 2010; 79: 55-61
  6. Cook A, Douet L, Boutron I. Descriptions of non-pharmacological interventions in clinical trials. BMJ 2013;347:f5212
  7. Fisher EB, Brownson CA, O'Toole ML, et al. Ecological Approaches to Self- Management: The Case of Diabetes. J Public Health 2005; 95:1523-1535 Available from: http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/files/kf/field/field_publication_file/supporting-people- manage-health-patient-activation-may14.pdf (Accessibility verified 24th July 2014)
  8. Turner A, Bourne C and McHattie D. The HOPE Course: A positive psychological self- management support programme for cancer survivors. Poster presentation. Changing Prospects for Cancer Conference, Manchester 4th April 2014.
  9. Pinnock H, Epiphaniou E and Taylor SJC. Phase IV implementation studies: the forgotten finale to the complex intervention methodology framework. Annals ATS 2014;S11: S118- S122
  10. Fredrickson B. What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology 1998; 2: 300-319
  11. Snyder CR. Hypothesis: There is hope. In C.R. Snyder (Ed.). Handbook of hope: Theory, measures and application. New York: Academic Press, 2000.
  12. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review 1977; 84: 191-215
  13. Krumholz HM, Currie PM, Riegel B, et al. A Taxonomy for Disease Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Disease Management Taxonomy Writing Group. Circulation 2006; 114: 1432-1445

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pearce, G., Parke, H. L., Pinnock, H., Epiphaniou, E., Bourne, C. L., Sheikh, A., & Taylor, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Coventry University (GB)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research (GB)
  • Glenfield Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Taylor, Stephanie JC
Venue
Journal of Health Services Research & Policy
Published
2015-09-15
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
73-82
ISSN
  • 1355-8196 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1060
OpenAlex
W2245743849
Cited by
181
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4
FWCI
5.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Health Services Research & Policy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Coventry University Open Collections (Coventry university) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • The Open Collections (Coventry University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (11/1014/04)
  • Coventry University
  • Health Services and Delivery Research Programme (11/1014/04)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
self-management support, taxonomy (general classification scheme), chronic disease, cancer survivors, intervention components, social support, caregivers, mode of delivery, intervention targeting, implementation trial, randomized controlled trials
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Patient Compliance, Patient Education as Topic, Self Care, Social Support, Caregivers, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review