Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 489

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 266 of the 266 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multidisciplinary standards of care and recent progress in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Open access
Grossberg, Aaron J., Chu, Linda C., Deig, Christopher R., Fishman, Eliot K., Hwang, William L., Maitra, Anirban, Marks, Daniel L., Mehta, Arnav, Nabavizadeh, Nima, Simeone, Diane M., Weekes, Colin D., Thomas, Charles R.·2020·CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians

Abstract

Despite tremendous gains in the molecular understanding of exocrine pancreatic cancer, the prognosis for this disease remains very poor, largely because of delayed disease detection and limited effectiveness of systemic therapies. Both incidence rates and mortality rates for pancreatic cancer have increased during the past decade, in contrast to most other solid tumor types. Recent improvements in multimodality care have substantially improved overall survival, local control, and metastasis‐free survival for patients who have localized tumors that are amenable to surgical resection. The widening gap in prognosis between patients with resectable and unresectable or metastatic disease reinforces the importance of detecting pancreatic cancer sooner to improve outcomes. Furthermore, the developing use of therapies that target tumor‐specific molecular vulnerabilities may offer improved disease control for patients with advanced disease. Finally, the substantial morbidity associated with pancreatic cancer, including wasting, fatigue, and pain, remains an under‐addressed component of this disease, which powerfully affects quality of life and limits tolerance to aggressive therapies. In this article, the authors review the current multidisciplinary standards of care in pancreatic cancer with a focus on emerging concepts in pancreatic cancer detection, precision therapy, and survivorship.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3322/caac.21626

Cites

266 of 266 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 266 references

Cited by

See all 489

Metadata

Authors
Grossberg, A. J., Chu, L. C., Deig, C. R., Fishman, E. K., Hwang, W. L., Maitra, A., Marks, D. L., Mehta, A., Nabavizadeh, N., Simeone, D. M., Weekes, C. D., & Thomas, C. R.
Venue
CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-07-19
Volume
70
Issue
5
Pages
375-403
ISSN
  • 0007-9235 (ISSN-L)
  • 1542-4863
OpenAlex
W3042568371
Cited by
489
References
266
FWCI
20.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multidisciplinary standards of care and recent progress in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3322/caac.21626
The paper
Grossberg, A. J., Chu, L. C., Deig, C. R., Fishman, E. K., Hwang, W. L., Maitra, A., Marks, D. L., Mehta, A., Nabavizadeh, N., Simeone, D. M., Weekes, C. D., & Thomas, C. R. (2020). Multidisciplinary standards of care and recent progress in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21626

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.