Cited by 776Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and ManagementBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsCerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis

The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism after discontinuing anticoagulation in patients with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. A prospective cohort study in 1,626 patients

Open access
Prandoni, P., Noventa, F., Ghirarduzzi, A., Pengo, V., Bernardi, E., Pesavento, R., Iotti, M., Tormene, D. +2 more·2007·Haematologica

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: While it has long been recognized that patients with acute unprovoked deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) have a higher risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) than that of patients with secondary thrombosis, whether other clinical parameters can help predict the development of recurrent events is controversial. The aim of this investigation was to assess the rate of recurrent VTE after withdrawal of vitamin K antagonists, and to identify clinical parameters associated with a higher likelihood of recurrence. DESIGN AND METHODS: We followed, up to a maximum of 10 years, 1626 consecutive patients who had discontinued anticoagulation after a first episode of clinically symptomatic proximal DVT and/or PE. All patients with clinically suspected recurrent VTE underwent objective tests to confirm or rule out the clinical suspicion. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 50 months, 373 patients (22.9%) had had recurrent episodes of VTE. The cumulative incidence of recurrent VTE was 11.0% (95% CI, 9.5-12.5) after 1 year, 19.6% (17.5-21.7) after 3 years, 29.1% (26.3-31.9) after 5 years, and 39.9% (35.4-44.4) after 10 years. The adjusted hazard ratio for recurrent VTE was 2.30 (95% CI, 1.82-2.90) in patients whose first VTE was unprovoked, 2.02 (1.52-2.69) in those with thrombophilia, 1.44 (1.03-2.03) in those presenting with primary DVT, 1.39 (1.08-1.80) for patients who received a shorter (up to 6 months) duration of anticoagulation, and 1.14 (1.06-1.12) for every 10-year increase of age. When the analysis was confined to patients with unprovoked VTE the results did not change. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Besides unprovoked presentation, other factors independently associated with a statistically significant increased risk of recurrent VTE are thrombophilia, clinical presentation with primary DVT, shorter duration of anticoagulation, and increasing age.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3324/haematol.10516

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For patients with unprovoked VTE, the risk of recurrent VTE after completing anticoagulant therapy is estimated to be 10% by 2 years and >30% by 10 years.

    “For patients with unprovoked VTE, the risks of recurrent VTE after completing a course of anticoagulant therapy have been estimated to be 10% by 2 years and . 30% by 10 years. 11,12”

    From American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (2020) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Discussion’s unprovoked (idiopathic) VTE figure reports 52.6% cumulative recurrence at 10 years, supporting the >30% estimate. It reports 15.0% at one year, however, so an estimate of 10% by two years is too low; the figure does not give a two-year estimate. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Trials in the previous analysis were published before 2004, whereas since then additional prospective studies have reported on the risk for recurrent VTE after discontinuation of anticoagulant treatment in patients with a first episode of unprovoked VTE, with several of these studies having followed patients beyond 24 months and some up to 10 years.

    “Furthermore, trials in that analysis were published before 2004, whereas since then additional prospective studies have reported on the risk for recurrent VTE after discontinuation of anticoagulant treatment in patients with a first episode of unprovoked VTE, with several of these studies having followed patients beyond 24 months and some up to 10 years.9 10 11 12 13”

    From Long term risk of symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism after discontinuation of anticoagulant treatment for first unprovoked venous thromboembolism event: systematic review and meta-analysis (2019) · cites this paper as [11]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Schulman S. The effect of the dura- tion of anticoagulation and other risk factors on the recurrence of venous thromboembolism. Wien Med Wöchenschr 1999;149:66-69.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prandoni, P., Noventa, F., Ghirarduzzi, A., Pengo, V., Bernardi, E., Pesavento, R., Iotti, M., Tormene, D., Simioni, P., & Pagnan, A.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Venue
Haematologica
Published
2007-02-01
Volume
92
Issue
2
Pages
199-205
ISSN
  • 0390-6078 (ISSN-L)
  • 1592-8721
OpenAlex
W2102778065
Cited by
776
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 77 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 45
FWCI
21.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Haematologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis
Keywords
recurrent venous thromboembolism, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, anticoagulation discontinuation, vitamin K antagonists, unprovoked venous thromboembolism, thrombophilia, anticoagulation duration, recurrence risk factors, proximal deep vein thrombosis, long-term follow-up, cumulative incidence, age as risk factor
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anticoagulants, Female, Heparin, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Pulmonary Embolism, Thromboembolism, Warfarin, Cohort Studies, Thrombophilia, Venous Thrombosis, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review