Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 395

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Diagnostic criteria for hematopoietic stem cell transplant-associated microangiopathy: results of a consensus process by an International Working Group

Open access
Ruutu, T., Barosi, G., Benjamin, R. J., Clark, R. E., George, J. N., Gratwohl, A., Holler, E., Iacobelli, M., Kentouche, K., Lammle, B., Moake, J. L., Richardson, P., Socie, G., Zeigler, Z., Niederwieser, D., Barbui, T., on an initiative of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and the European LeukemiaNet·2007·Haematologica

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There are no widely accepted criteria for the definition of hematopoietic stem cell transplant -associated microangiopathy (TAM). An International Working Group was formed to develop a consensus formulation of criteria for diagnosing clinically significant TAM. DESIGN AND METHODS: The participants proposed a list of candidate criteria, selected those considered necessary, and ranked those considered optional to identify a core set of criteria. Three obligatory criteria and four optional criteria that ranked highest formed a core set. In an appropriateness panel process, the participants scored the diagnosis of 16 patient profiles as appropriate or not appropriate for TAM. Using the experts' ratings on the patient profiles as a gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of 24 candidate definitions of the disorder developed from the core set of criteria were evaluated. A nominal group technique was used to facilitate consensus formation. The definition of TAM with the highest score formed the final RESULTS: The Working Group proposes that the diagnosis of TAM requires fulfilment of all of the following criteria: (i) >4% schistocytes in blood; (ii) de novo, prolonged or progressive thrombocytopenia (platelet count <50 x 109/L or 50% or greater reduction from previous counts); (iii) sudden and persistent increase in lactate dehydrogenase concentration; (iv) decrease in hemoglobin concentration or increased transfusion requirement; and (v) decrease in serum haptoglobin. The sensitivity and specificity of this definition exceed 80%. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: The Working Group recommends that the presented criteria of TAM be adopted in clinical use, especially in scientific trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3324/haematol.10699

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 395

Metadata

Authors
Ruutu, T., Barosi, G., Benjamin, R. J., Clark, R. E., George, J. N., Gratwohl, A., Holler, E., Iacobelli, M., Kentouche, K., Lammle, B., Moake, J. L., Richardson, P., Socie, G., Zeigler, Z., Niederwieser, D., Barbui, T., & on an initiative of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and the European LeukemiaNet
Venue
Haematologica
Published
2007-01-01
Volume
92
Issue
1
Pages
95-100
ISSN
  • 0390-6078 (ISSN-L)
  • 1592-8721
OpenAlex
W2112756201
Cited by
395
References
0
FWCI
6.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnostic criteria for hematopoietic stem cell transplant-associated microangiopathy: results of a consensus process by an International Working Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3324/haematol.10699
The paper
Ruutu, T., Barosi, G., Benjamin, R. J., Clark, R. E., George, J. N., Gratwohl, A., Holler, E., Iacobelli, M., Kentouche, K., Lammle, B., Moake, J. L., Richardson, P., Socie, G., Zeigler, Z., Niederwieser, D., Barbui, T., & on an initiative of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and the European LeukemiaNet. (2007). Diagnostic criteria for hematopoietic stem cell transplant-associated microangiopathy: results of a consensus process by an International Working Group. Haematologica. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.10699

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.