An integrated method for evaluating the quality of education and university performance
Open accessAbstract
Purpose. To create an integrated methodology for assessing educational and scientific activities of higher education institutions (HEI) following the recommendations of international ranking agencies and specific indicators that consider the institutions position at the national level. Methodology. The combined method of evaluation of the HEI activity is applied. Some evaluation indicators are inherent in the HEI (in whole or in part). Others have a specific numerical value. The calculation of the final ranking indicator is based on comparing universities according to the indicators from the methodology (ranking positions in the world educational and scientific space, education quality indicators, financial indicators, and quality of scientific activity) with the reference university, which has the best result for each indicator. Findings. An integrated methodology algorithm for assessing the educational and scientific activities of the HEI is presented and recommendations are given for the use of each of the indicators depending on the peculiarities of the ranking (for example, general ranking or ranking by direction). Originality. An integrated method of external evaluation of educational and scientific activities is proposed, considering both well-known indicators of world ranking agencies and specific (different from world ranking indicators) indicators for assessing universities activities at the national level. Practical value. The method allows determining some economic indicators of the dynamics (positive or negative) of university development and finding bottlenecks in the implementation of specific activities in the institutions educational and scientific activities. The methodology considers the actual educational activities (training of higher education institutions at all levels). It also allows us to assess the success of free economics in implementing scientific activities as a significant factor in creating new knowledge and improving educational services quality.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Bercovitz, J. E. L., & Feldman, M. P. (2005) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-005-5029-z · Cited by 779 · see citing works
The Strategic Management of Innovation: A Systematic Review and Paths for Future Research
Keupp, M. M., Palmié, M., & Gassmann, O. (2011) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00321.x · Cited by 596 · see citing works
Are university rankings useful to improve research? A systematic review
Vernon, M., Balas, E. A., & Momani, S. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0193762 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Econometric studies of higher education
Ehrenberg, R. G. (2003) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2003.10.008 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Cox, J. (2020) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102219 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Quantifying the Impact and Relevance of Scientific Research
Sutherland, W. J., Goulson, D., Potts, S. G., & Dicks, L. V. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027537 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Воронцова, А., Vasylieva, T., Bilan, Y. V., Ostasz, G., & Mayboroda, T. M. (2020) · ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC · doi:10.24818/amp/2020.34-01 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationSWOT Analysis and Its Implementation Strategies in Educational Management
Keban, Y. B., Arifin, S., & Wahyono, R. (2019) · doi:10.7176/jep/10-12-10 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Quality Gap Analysis on Education Services
Mn, M. D., Gouvea Maria, A., & Conejero Marco, A. (2018) · IJAME · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Amann, W., & Azarmi, T. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20588-5 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Vasylieva, T. A., & Kasyanenko, V. O. (2013). Integral assessment of innovation potential of Ukraine's national economy: A scientific me thodical approach and practical calculations. Actual Problems of Eco- nomics, 144(6), 5059. Retrieved from https://ecoscience.net/down loads/.
- Hanushek, E. A. (2005). Why quality matters in education. Finance and Development, 42(2), 1519. Retrieved from https://www.research gate.net/publication/252555388_Why_Quality_Matters_in_Educa tion.
- Todorut, A. V. (2016). A new architecture of quality in education. Quality -Access to Success, 17(153), 6063. Retrieved from https://www. srac.ro/calitatea/en/arhiva/2016/201604Abstracts.pdf.
- Hazelkorn, E. (2013). How Rankings are Reshaping Higher Edu cation. in Climent, V., Michavila, F., & Ripolles, M. (Eds.) (2013). Los Rankings Univeritarios. Mitos y Realidades. Retrieved from https:// arrow.tudublin.ie/cserbk/23/.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial intelligence applications in Latin American higher education: a systematic review
Salas-Pilco, S. Z., & Yang, Y. (2022) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-022-00326-w · Cited by 330 · see citing works
Immersive University Model: A Tool to Increase Higher Education Competitiveness
Artyukhov, A., Volk, I., Dluhopolskyi, O., Mieszajkina, E., & Myśliwiecka, A. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15107771 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Artyukhov, A. Y., Vasylieva, T. A., & Lyeonov, S. V.
- Venue
- Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu
- Publisher
- Dnipro University of Technology
- Published
- 2021
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 148-154
- ISSN
- 2071-2227 (ISSN-L)
- 2223-2362
- OpenAlex
- W3177005407
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 4.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Higher Education Governance and Development
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
- Keywords
- university rankings, higher education assessment, ranking indicators, higher education institutions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
