Cited by 7Extraction and Separation ProcessesChemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous SolutionsRadioactive element chemistry and processing

Cyanex 302: An extractant for Fe3+ from Chloride Medium

Open access
Ali, MR, Biswas, RK, Salam, SMA, Akhter, A, Karmakar, AK, Ullah, MH·1970·Bangladesh Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research

Abstract

The solvent extraction of Fe3+ from aqueous chloride solution by bis-(2,4,4-trimethylpentyl) monothiophosphinic acid (Cyanex 302, H2A2) dissolved in kerosene has been investigated over a wide range of aqueous acidity as a function of phase contact time, concentrations of Fe3+, H+ and Cl- in the aqueous phase, Cyanex 302 concentration in the organic phase and temperature. The equilibration time is 50 min. The distribution ratio is found to be independent on [Fe3+] in the aqueous phase at a constant aqueous acidity and extractant concentration. The H+, extractant and Cl- dependences are -1, 0.5 in low concentration region of extractant and -0.5, respectively; which suggest that extraction occurs via the following two parallel reactions: (i) FeCl3 + 0.5 H2A2(o) FeCl2.A(o) + H+ + Cl-; and (ii) FeCl2 + + 0.5 H2A2(o) -----FeCl2A(o) + H+. Temperature dependence data give ΔH value of 9.95 kJ/ mol. The loading capacity of Cyanex 302 towards Fe3+ is 29.41 g Fe3+/100 g Cyanex 302. The extraction equilibrium constant (Kex) is 10-0.632. Extraction ratio is found to be dependent on diluent used. Stripping of the extracted complex is found to be a difficult task, but may be made effective by a solution containing 6 M H2SO4 and 1 M Na2C2O4. Keywords: Extraction equilibrium; Fe3+ extraction; Cyanex 302; Chloride medium.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjsir.v46i4.9583 BJSIR 2011; 46(4): 407-414

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3329/bjsir.v46i4.9583

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ali, M., Biswas, R., Salam, S., Akhter, A., Karmakar, A., & Ullah, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Rajshahi (BD)
  • Bangladesh Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (BD)
Venue
Bangladesh Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research
Published
1970-01-01
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
407-414
ISSN
  • 0304-9809 (ISSN-L)
  • 2224-7157
OpenAlex
W2057065831
Cited by
7
References
22
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
Bangladesh Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
University of Chittagong
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Radioactive element chemistry and processing
Keywords
Cyanex 302, solvent extraction, iron(III) extraction, chloride media, distribution ratio, extraction equilibrium, extraction enthalpy, loading capacity, stripping, diluent effects, ferrous iron

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review