Cited by 15Ultrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsBarrier Structure and Function StudiesAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Characteristics of Focused Ultrasound Mediated Blood-Brain Barrier Opening in Magnetic Resonance Images

Open access
Chang, Kyung Won, Hong, Seung Woo, Chang, Won Seok, Jung, Hyun Ho, Chang, Jin Woo·2023·Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society

Abstract

Objective : The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is an obstacle for molecules to pass through from blood to the brain. Focused ultrasound is a new method which temporarily opens the BBB, which makes pharmaceutical delivery or removal of neurodegenerative proteins possible. This study was demonstrated to review our BBB opening procedure with magnetic resonance guided images and find specific patterns in the BBB opening.Methods : In this study, we reviewed the procedures and results of two clinical studies on BBB opening using focused ultrasound regarding its safety and clinical efficacy. Magnetic resonance images were also reviewed to discover any specific findings.Results : Two clinical trials showed clinical benefits. All clinical trials demonstrated safe BBB opening, with no specific side effects. Magnetic resonance imaging showed temporary T1 contrast enhancement in the sonication area, verifying the BBB opening. Several low-signal intensity spots were observed in the T2 susceptibility-weighted angiography images, which were also reversible and temporary. Although these spots can be considered as microbleeding, evidence suggests these are not ordinary microbleeding but an indicator for adequate BBB opening.Conclusion : Magnetic resonance images proved safe and efficient BBB opening in humans, using focused ultrasound.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3340/jkns.2022.0236

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chang, K. W., Hong, S. W., Chang, W. S., Jung, H. H., & Chang, J. W.
Affiliations
Yonsei University (KR)
Corresponding author
Chang, Jin Woo
Venue
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
Published
2023-03-01
Volume
66
Issue
2
Pages
172-182
ISSN
  • 1225-8245 (ISSN-L)
  • 2005-3711
  • 1598-7876
OpenAlex
W4312018501
Cited by
15
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • YUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
focused ultrasound, blood-brain barrier opening, transcranial ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, T1 contrast enhancement, microbleeds, brain drug delivery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review