Cited by 457Human Health and DiseaseObesity, Physical Activity, DietGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors

2007 Korean National Growth Charts: review of developmental process and an outlook

Open access
Moon, Jin Soo, Lee, Soon Young, Nam, Chung Mo, Choi, Joong-Myung, Choe, Bong-Keun, Seo, Jeong-Wan, Oh, Kyungwon, Jang, Myoung-Jin +4 more·2008·Korean Journal of Pediatrics

Abstract

Purpose : Since 1967, The Korean Pediatric Society and Korean Government have developed Korean Growth Standards every 10 years. Last version was published in 1998. During past 40 years, Korean Growth Standards were mainly descriptive charts without any systematic nor statistical standardization. With the global epidemic of obesity, many authorities such as World Health Organization (WHO) and United States' Centers for Disease Control (CDC) have been changed their principles of growth charts to cope with the situations like ours. This article summarizes and reviews the whole developmental process of new 2007 Korean Growth Charts with discussion. Methods : With the initiative of Division of Chronic Disease Surveillance in Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we have performed new national survey for the development of new Standards in 2005 and identified marked increase of childhood obesity and plateau of secular increment of final height in late adolescents. We have developed new Growth Standards via adapting several innovative methods, including standardization of all available raw data, which were acquired in 1997 and 2005 national survey and full application of LMS method. Results : We could get new standardized charts; weight-for-age, length/height-for-age, weight-for- height, head circumference-for-age and BMI-for-age. Other non-standardized charts based on 2005 survey data were also published; waist circumference-for-age, mid-arm circumference-for-age, chest circumference-for-age and skinfold-for-age. Clinical guideline was also developed. Conclusion : Developmental process and results of new Korean Growth Charts are comparable with other internationally well-known Growth Standards, WHO 2006 Growth Standards and CDC Growth Charts. 2007 Korean Growth Charts are relevant especially in Korea and Korean ethnic groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3345/kjp.2008.51.1.1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The currently used WC reference was published in the 2007 Korean National Growth Charts.

    “The currently used WC reference, which was published in the 2007 Korean National Growth Charts, has several drawbacks;”
  • The 2007 WC reference included only several percentile values.

    “The currently used WC reference, which was published in the 2007 Korean National Growth Charts, has several drawbacks; specifically, its development did not adopt standardized measurements of WC, only included several percentile values, presented no graphical charts, and did not exclude children and adolescents with severe obesity.18,19”
  • The 2007 WC reference did not exclude children and adolescents with severe obesity.

    “The currently used WC reference, which was published in the 2007 Korean National Growth Charts, has several drawbacks; specifically, its development did not adopt standardized measurements of WC, only included several percentile values, presented no graphical charts, and did not exclude children and adolescents with severe obesity.18,19”
  • The 2007 Korean National Growth Charts WC reference did not adopt standardized measurements of WC.

    “The currently used WC reference, which was published in the 2007 Korean National Growth Charts, has several drawbacks; specifically, its development did not adopt standardized measurements of WC, only included several percentile values, presented no graphical charts, and did not exclude children and adolescents with severe obesity.18,19”
  • The 2007 WC reference presented no graphical charts.

    “The currently used WC reference, which was published in the 2007 Korean National Growth Charts, has several drawbacks; specifically, its development did not adopt standardized measurements of WC, only included several percentile values, presented no graphical charts, and did not exclude children and adolescents with severe obesity.18,19”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moon, J. S., Lee, S. Y., Nam, C. M., Choi, J.-M., Choe, B.-K., Seo, J.-W., Oh, K., Jang, M.-J., Hwang, S.-S., Yoo, M. H., Kim, Y. T., & Lee, C. G.
Affiliations
  • The Committee for the Development of Growth Standard for Korean Children and Adolescents, Korea.
  • The Committee for School Health and Public Health Statistics, The Korean Pediatric Society, Korea.
  • Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KR)
Venue
Korean Journal of Pediatrics
Published
2008
Volume
51
Issue
1
Pages
1
ISSN
1738-1061 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044422395
Cited by
457
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 32
FWCI
14.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Korean Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Human Health and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
Keywords
growth standards, growth charts, childhood obesity, secular growth trends, adult height, LMS algorithm, anthropometric reference values, CDC growth charts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review