Cited by 48Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiet, Metabolism, and DiseaseAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases

The Prevalence of the Metabolic Syndrome in Korean Adults: Comparison of WHO and NCEP Criteria

Open access
Choi, Sung Hee, Ahn, Chul Woo, Cha, Bong Soo, Chung, Yoon-Sok, Lee, Kwan Woo, Lee, Hyun Chul, Huh, Kap Bum, Kim, Dae Jung·2005·Yonsei Medical Journal

Abstract

The aims of this study were to compare the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome according to the WHO and NCEP ATP III criteria in Korean adults, and to compare the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome with the results in previous Korean studies. The study comprised 1,230 subjects (627 men, 603 women) aged 30-79 years (mean 52.4 +/- 10.3 years) who underwent medical check-up from April to June, 2001 in the Korea Association of Health (KAH). The prevalence of the metabolic syndrome according to the modified WHO criteria was 21.8 % of men and 19.4 % of women. However, the prevalence was increased 1.6 times (34.2 % ) in men and 2.0 times (38.7 % ) in women using the modified NCEP criteria. The prevalence of the metabolic syndrome has varied widely according to differences in the criteria. Thus, further studies are necessary to define the appropriate criteria of the metabolic syndrome for Korean adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3349/ymj.2005.46.2.198

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Choi, S. H., Ahn, C. W., Cha, B. S., Chung, Y.-S., Lee, K. W., Lee, H. C., Huh, K. B., & Kim, D. J.
Affiliations
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Yonsei University (KR)
  • Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Ajou University (KR)
  • Huh's Diabetes Center and 21 century Diabetes and Vascular Research Institute, Seoul, Korea.
Corresponding author
Kim, Dae Jung
Venue
Yonsei Medical Journal
Published
2005
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
198
ISSN
0513-5796 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2118645335
Cited by
48
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Yonsei Medical Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • YUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • AJOU Open Repository (Ajou University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
Keywords
metabolic syndrome, prevalence, WHO criteria, NCEP ATP III criteria, diagnostic criteria comparison, sex differences, Korean adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cholesterol, Female, Health Education, Humans, Korea, Male, Middle Aged, World Health Organization, Prevalence, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Metabolic Syndrome, Asian People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review