Cited by 29Marine Toxins and Detection MethodsMarine and coastal ecosystemsAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

Karlodinium veneficum feeding responses and effects on larvae of the eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica under variable nitrogen:phosphorus stoichiometry.

Lin, CH, Accoroni, S, Glibert, PM·2017·Aquatic Microbial Ecology

Abstract

Mixotrophic feeding can be promoted by nutrient-enriched prey, a nutritional strategy which can provide benefits to some toxic microalgae under nutrient-imbalanced conditions. However, it is unclear how the nutritional condition of the predator or the prey affects the mixotrophy and toxicity of toxin-producing mixotrophs. Laboratory experiments were conducted to measure growth and feeding rates of Karlodinium veneficum with addition of Rhodomonas salina as prey under varied nitrogen (N):phosphorus (P) stoichiometry (molar N:P of 4, 16 and 32) of both predator and prey and with K. veneficum initially in different growth phases (exponential and stationary). Growth rates of initially exponential- and stationary-phase K. veneficum were enhanced in the presence of prey with reciprocal nutrient conditions. Feeding rates (measured as prey death rates) were highest for low-NP K. veneficum initially growing exponentially and mixed with N-rich prey. Maximum feeding rates of low-NP K. veneficum on N-rich prey during exponential growth were ~4-fold higher than the rates of high-NP K. veneficum on N-rich prey. The nutritionally different K. veneficum were tested with larvae of the eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica to compare putative toxicity. Larval mortality was significantly increased in 2 d exposures to high-NP K. veneficum monocultures in both growth phases. When mixed with N-rich prey, the presence of K. veneficum resulted in significantly enhanced larval mortality, but this was not the case for low-NP K. veneficum in exponential phase. Enhanced growth of K. veneficum and increased negative effects of K. veneficum on larval survival appeared to be highest when fed prey with higher N:P content.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3354/ame01823

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, C., Accoroni, S., & Glibert, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (US)
  • Marche Polytechnic University (IT)
Corresponding author
Lin, CH
Venue
Aquatic Microbial Ecology
Published
2017-05-09
Volume
79
Issue
2
Pages
101-114
ISSN
  • 0948-3055 (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-1564
OpenAlex
W2595025512
Cited by
29
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Aquatic Microbial Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • Università Politecnica delle Marche (Università Politecnica delle Marche) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Marine Toxins and Detection Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Keywords
Karlodinium veneficum, nitrogen-phosphorus stoichiometry, Rhodomonas salina, Crassostrea virginica, larval mortality, predator-prey interactions, harmful algal blooms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review