CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 356Academic integrity and plagiarismLaw, AI, and Intellectual PropertyEthics and Social Impacts of AI

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Plagiarism in the age of massive Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPT-3)

Open access
Dehouche, N·2021·Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics
DOI 10.3354/esep00195
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

As if 2020 was not a peculiar enough year, its fifth month saw the relatively quiet publication of a preprint describing the most powerful natural language processing (NLP) system to date—GPT-3 (Generative Pre-trained Transformer-3)—created by the Silicon Valley research firm OpenAI. Though the software implementation of GPT-3 is still in its initial beta release phase, and its full capabilities are still unknown as of the time of this writing, it has been shown that this artificial intelligence can comprehend prompts in natural language, on virtually any topic, and generate relevant original text content that is indistinguishable from human writing. Moreover, access to these capabilities, in a limited yet worrisome enough extent, is available to the general public. This paper presents examples of original content generated by the author using GPT-3. These examples illustrate some of the capabilities of GPT-3 in comprehending prompts in natural language and generating convincing content in response. I use these examples to raise specific fundamental questions pertaining to the intellectual property of this content and the potential use of GPT-3 to facilitate plagiarism. The goal is to instigate a sense of urgency, as well as a sense of present tardiness on the part of the academic community in addressing these questions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3354/esep00195

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 25 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Asaro PM (2016) The liability problem for autonomous artificial agents. Proc AAAI Spring Symposium Series, Ethical and Moral Considerations in Non-Human Agents track. p 190-194. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/SSS/SSS16/paper/view/12699
  2. Bostrom N (2016) Superintelligence. Oxford University Press, Oxford
  3. Francke E, Alexander B (2019) The potential influence of artificial intelligence on plagiarism a higher education perspective. In: Griffiths P, Kabir MN (eds) Proc European Conference on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics. EM Normandie Business School, Oxford, p 131-140
  4. Govindarajulu NS, Bringsjord S (2015) Ethical regulation of robots must be embedded in their operating systems. In: Trappl R (ed) A construction manual for robots’ ethical systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, p 85-99
  5. Miyashita K, Russell D (1995) Keiretsu: inside the hidden Japanese conglomerates. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY
  6. 10.24318/cope2018.1.3 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 356

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Dehouche, N.
Affiliations
Mahidol University (TH)
Corresponding author
Dehouche, N
ORCID
Dehouche, N
Venue
Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics
Publisher
Inter-Research Science Center
Published
2021-03-25
Volume
21
Pages
17-23
ISSN
  • 1611-8014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1863-5415
DOI
10.3354/esep00195
OpenAlex
W3125358881
Cited by
296
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8
FWCI
64.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Mahidol University International College
  • University of Oxford
  • Mahidol University
  • Région Normandie
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
plagiarism, GPT-3, generative pre-trained transformer, large language models, intellectual property, academic integrity, AI-generated text

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review