Cited by 59Marine Ecology and Invasive SpeciesFish Ecology and Management StudiesMarine and fisheries research

A coordinated and sustained international strategy is required to turn the tide on the Atlantic lionfish invasion

Open access
Johnston, MW, Purkis, SJ·2015·Marine Ecology Progress Series

Abstract

Atlantic lionfish have caused measurable ecosystem damage in their invaded range.As a matter of urgency, strategies to suppress lionfish have therefore risen to the fore amongst the ocean management community.We use a biophysical model and ocean climate data to demonstrate how Atlantic lionfish larvae are dispersed by currents and how this dispersal, combined with their breeding strategy, negates effective control using methods traditionally executed on a local scale.This study quantitatively emphasizes the high level of larval connectivity that exists between the many nations whose waters now support established lionfish populations.For any given area, our results indicate that the key to suppressing the invasion is to simultaneously choke all upstream linkages that supply external larvae and renourish the local population.On the basis of a case study developed for the Carolinas, USA, an area of high lionfish abundance, the model suggests that such a strategy requires monthly culls that remove 20% of lionfish biomass in the Carolinas and all locations to which the Carolinas are linked hydrographically.Conversely, if culls target only those locales that deliver the majority (95%) of lionfish larvae to the Carolinas, and therefore ignore those locations which contribute the remaining 5% of lionfish larvae, the requisite cull rate exceeds 60% and suppresses lionfish abundance for only 5 yr.The latter finding exposes an intrinsic danger: sparse lionfish left uncontrolled may derail a concerted, yet not comprehensive, effort to control the invader.This study provides a modelling approach to quantitatively target and manage the lionfish population for nations whose waters are now plagued by invasive lionfish.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3354/meps11399

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sporadic, infrequent lionfish removal events that leave remnant populations are not effective at curbing lionfish biomass over a temporal span of greater than 5 years.

    “However, recent modeling results suggest that sporadic, infrequent lionfish removal events that leave remnant populations are not effective at curbing lionfish biomass over a temporal span of greater than 5 years11.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Ahrenholz DW, Morris JA (2010) Larval duration of the lion- fish, Pterois volitans along the Bahamian Archipelago. Environ Biol Fishes 88: 305-309 · DOI
  2. Akins JL, Morris JA, Green SJ (2014) In situ tagging tech- nique for fishes provides insight into growth and move- ment of invasive lionfish. Ecol Evol 4: 3768-3777 · DOI
  3. Albins MA, Hixon MA (2011) Worst case scenario: potential long-term effects of invasive predatory lionfish (Pterois volitans) on Atlantic and Caribbean coral-reef communi- ties. Environ Biol Fish 96: 1151-1157 · DOI
  4. Arias-González JE, González-Gándara C, Luis Cabrera J, Christensen V (2011) Predicted impact of the invasive lionfish Pterois volitans on the food web of a Caribbean coral reef. Environ Res 111: 917-925 · DOI
  5. Barbour AB, Montgomery ML, Adamson AL, Díaz-Ferguson E, Silliman BR (2010) Mangrove use by the invasive lion- fish Pterois volitans. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 401: 291-294 · DOI
  6. Betancur-R R, Hines A, Acero AP, Orti G, Wilbur AE, Fresh- water DW (2011) Reconstructing the lionfish invasion: insights into Greater Caribbean biogeography. J Bio- geogr 38: 1281-1293 · DOI
  7. Bonjean F, Lagerloef GSE (2002) Diagnostic model and analysis of the surface currents in the tropical Pacific Ocean. J Phys Oceanogr 32: 2938-2954 · DOI
  8. Briggs JC (1974) Marine zoogeography. McGraw Hill, New York, NY
  9. Carlin JL, Robertson DR, Bowen BW (2003) Ancient diver- gences and recent connections in two tropical Atlantic reef fishes Epinephelus adscensionis and Rypticus sapo - na ceous (Percoidei: Serranidae). Mar Biol 143: 1057-1069 · DOI
  10. Chassignet EP, Hurlburt HE, Smedstad OM, Halliwell GR and others (2007) The HYCOM (hybrid coordinate ocean model) data assimilative system. J Mar Syst 65: 60-83 · DOI
  11. Cowen RK, Lwiza KM, Sponaugle S, Paris CB, Olson DB (2000) Connectivity of marine populations: open or closed? Science 287: 857-859 · DOI
  12. Frazer TK, Jacoby CA, Edwards MA, Barry SC, Manfrino CM (2012) Coping with the lionfish invasion: Can tar- geted removals yield beneficial effects? Rev Fish Sci 20: 185-191 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Freshwater DW, Hines A, Parham S, Wilbur A and others (2009) Mitochondrial control region sequence analyses indicate dispersal from the US East Coast as the source of the invasive Indo-Pacific lionfish Pterois volitans in the Bahamas. Mar Biol 156: 1213-1221 · DOI
  14. Green SJ, Côté IM (2009) Record densities of Indo-Pacific lionfish on Bahamian coral reefs. Coral Reefs 28: 107 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Green SJ, Akins JL, Maljkovi A, Côté IM (2012) Invasive lionfish drive Atlantic coral reef fish declines. PLoS ONE 7: e32596 Green SJ, Dulvy N K, Brooks AL, Akins JL, Cooper AB, Miller S, Côté IM (2014) Linking removal targets to the ecological effects of invaders: a predictive model and field test. Ecol Appl 24: 1311-1322 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Hackerott S, Valdivia A, Green SJ, Côté IM and others (2013) N ative predators do not influence invasion suc- cess of Pacific lionfish on Caribbean Reefs. PLoS ONE 8: e68259 · DOI
  17. Johnston MW, Purkis SJ (2011) Spatial analysis of the inva- sion of lionfish in the western Atlantic and Caribbean. Mar Pollut Bull 62: 1218-1226 · DOI
  18. Johnston MW, Purkis SJ (2014a) Lionfish in the eastern Pacific: a cellular automaton approach to assessing invasion risk. Biol Invas 16: 2681-2695 · DOI
  19. Johnston MW, Purkis SJ (2014b) Are lionfish set for a Medi- terranean invasion? Modelling explains why this is unlikely to occur. Mar Pollut Bull 88: 138-147 · DOI
  20. Johnston MW, Purkis SJ (2015) Hurricanes accelerated the Florida-Bahamas lionfish invasion. Glob Chang Biol 21: 2249-2260 · DOI
  21. Jud ZR, Layman CA (2012) Site fidelity and movement pat- terns of invasive lionfish, Pterois spp., in a Florida estu- ary. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 414-415: 69-74 · DOI
  22. Kool JT, Paris CB, Andréfouët S, Cowen RK (2010) Complex migration and the development of genetic structure in subdivided populations: an example from Caribbean coral reef ecosystems. Ecography 33: 597-606 · DOI
  23. Kourafalou VH, Peng G, Kang H, Hogan PJ, Smedstad OM, Weisberg RH (2009) Evaluation of global ocean data assimilation experiment products on South Florida nested simulations with the Hybrid Coordinate Ocean Model. Ocean Dyn 59: 47-66 · DOI
  24. Mumby PJ, Harborne AR, Brumbaugh DR (2011) Grouper as a natural biocontrol of invasive lionfish. PLoS ON E 6: e21510 Paris CB, Cowen RK (2004) Direct evidence of a biophysical retention mechanism for coral reef fish larvae. Limnol Oceanogr 49: 1964-1979 · DOI
  25. Paris CB, Cowen RK, Claro R, Lindeman KC (2005) Larval transport pathways from Cuban snapper (Lutjanidae) spawning aggregations based on biophysical modeling. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 296: 93-106 · DOI
  26. Paris CB, Helgers J, Van Sebille E, Srinivasan A (2013) Con- nectivity Modeling System: a probabilistic modeling tool for the multi-scale tracking of biotic and abiotic variabil- ity in the ocean. Environ Model Softw 42: 47-54 · DOI
  27. Prasad TG, Hogan PJ (2007) Upper-ocean response to Hur- ricane Ivan in a 1/25° nested Gulf of Mexico HYCOM. J Geophys Res C 112: C04013. doi: 10.1029/ 2006 JC 003695 · DOI
  28. Richards VP, Thomas JD, Stanhope MJ, Shivji MS (2007) Genetic connectivity in the Florida reef system: compar- ative phylogeography of commensal invertebrates with contrasting reproductive strategies. Mol Ecol 16: 139-157 · DOI
  29. Schofield PJ (2010) Update on geographic spread of invasive lionfishes (Pterois volitans [Linnaeus 1758] and P. miles [Bennett 1828]) in the Western N orth Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean Sea and Gulf of Mexico. Aquat Invasions 5: S117-S122 · DOI
  30. Tamburello N , Côté IM (2015) Movement ecology of Indo=Pacific lionfish on Caribbean coral reefs and its implications for invasion dynamics. Biol Invasions 17: 1639-1653 · DOI
  31. Valdez-Moreno M, Quintal-Lizama C, Gómez-Lozano R, del Carmen García-Rivas M (2012) Monitoring an alien inva- sion: DN A barcoding and the identification of lionfish and their prey on coral reefs of the Mexican Caribbean. PLoS ONE 7: e36636 · DOI
  32. Whitfield PE, Hare JA, David AW, Harter SL, Munoz RC, Addison CM (2007) Abundance estimates of the Indo- Pacific lionfish Pterois volitans/miles complex in the Western North Atlantic. Biol Invasions 9: 53-64 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Whitfield PE, Muñoz RC, Buckel CA, Degan BP, Freshwater DW, Hare JA (2014) Native fish community structure and Indo-Pacific lionfish Pterois volitans densities along a depth-temperature gradient in Onslow Bay, North Car- olina, USA. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 509: 241-254 Editorial responsibility: Alejandro Gallego, Aberdeen, UK Submitted: January 22, 2015; Accepted: June 19, 2015 Proofs received from author(s): July 31, 2015 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnston, M., & Purkis, S.
Venue
Marine Ecology Progress Series
Published
2015-08-06
Volume
533
Pages
219-235
ISSN
  • 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-1599
OpenAlex
W1649111672
Cited by
59
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
5.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Marine Ecology Progress Series (publishedVersion)
  • NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Research Institute
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine Ecology and Invasive Species
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
Keywords
Pterois volitans, invasive species, biological control, larval dispersal, larval connectivity, ocean currents, invasive species management, biophysical model, Carolina, breeding strategies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review