Cited by 135Marine Ecology and Invasive SpeciesFish Ecology and Management StudiesAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies

A stage-based matrix population model of invasive lionfish with implications for control

Morris, James A., Shertzer, Kyle W., Rice, James A.·2011·Biological Invasions

Abstract

The rapid invasion of lionfish into the Western North Atlantic and Caribbean will undoubtedly affect native reef fishes via processes such as trophic disruption and niche takeover, yet little is known about the dynamics of this invasion. We constructed a stage-based, matrix population model in which matrix elements were comprised of lower-level parameters. Lionfish vital rates were estimated from existing literature and from new field and laboratory studies. Sensitivity analysis of lower-level parameters revealed that population growth rate is most influenced by larval mortality; elasticity analysis of the matrix indicated strong influence of the adult and juvenile survival elements. Based on this model, approximately 27% of an invading adult lionfish population would have to be removed monthly for abundance to decrease. Hierarchical modeling indicated that this point estimate falls within a broad uncertainty interval which could result from imprecise estimates of life-history parameters. The model demonstrated that sustained removal efforts could be substantially more effective by targeting juveniles as well as adults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10530-010-9786-8

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both of these studies relied on parameters that were not derived from data on lionfish reproduction in the Caribbean.

    “Both of these studies relied on parameters that were not derived from data on lionfish reproduction in the Caribbean.”

    From Reproductive biology of invasive lionfish (Pterois spp.) (2015) · cites this paper as Morris et al., 2011a

  • To date, two studies have used modeling to predict responses of lionfish populations to removals.

    “To date, two studies have used modeling to predict responses of lionfish populations to removals (Barbour et al., 2011;Morris et al., 2011a).”

    From Reproductive biology of invasive lionfish (Pterois spp.) (2015) · cites this paper as Morris et al., 2011a

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morris, J. A., Shertzer, K. W., & Rice, J. A.
Affiliations
  • NOAA National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science (US)
  • NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (US)
  • North Carolina State University (US)
Corresponding author
Morris, James A.
Venue
Biological Invasions
Published
2010-06-05
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
7-12
ISSN
  • 1387-3547 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1464
OpenAlex
W2124359818
Cited by
135
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biological Invasions (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine Ecology and Invasive Species
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Keywords
lionfish, Pterois volitans, invasive species, population dynamics, vital rates, larval mortality, population growth rate, sensitivity analysis, elasticity analysis, invasive species management, juvenile survival, Caribbean, western North Atlantic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review