The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Selective foraging by fish-eating killer whales Orcinus orca in British Columbia
Open accessAbstract
MEPS Marine Ecology Progress Series Contact the journal Facebook Twitter RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout the JournalEditorsTheme Sections MEPS 316:185-199 (2006) - doi:10.3354/meps316185 Selective foraging by fish-eating killer whales Orcinus orca in British Columbia John K. B. Ford*, Graeme M. Ellis Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Pacific Biological Station, 3190 Hammond Bay Road, Nanaimo, British Columbia V9T 6N7, Canada *Email: fordjo@pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca ABSTRACT: As the apex non-human marine predator, the killer whale Orcinus orca feeds on a wide diversity of marine fauna. Different ecotypic forms of the species, which often exist in sympatry, may have distinct foraging specialisations. One form found in coastal waters of the temperate NE Pacific Ocean, known as the resident ecotype, feeds predominantly on salmonid prey. An earlier study that used opportunistic collection of prey remains from kill sites as an indicator of predation rates suggested that resident killer whales may forage selectively for chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, the largest but one of the least abundant Pacific salmon species. Potential biases in the prey fragment sampling technique, however, made the validity of this finding uncertain. We undertook field studies of foraging behaviour of resident killer whales to resolve this uncertainty and to examine potential variation in prey selection by season, geographical area, group membership and prey availability. Foraging by resident killer whales was found to frequently involve sharing by 2 or more whales. Prey fragments left at kill sites resulted mostly from handling and breaking up of prey for sharing, and all species and sizes of salmonids were shared. Resident killer whale groups in all parts of the study area foraged selectively for chinook salmon, probably because of the species large size, high lipid content, and year-round availability in the whales range. Chum salmon Oncorhynchus keta, the second largest salmonid, were also taken when available, but smaller sockeye O. nerka and pink O. gorbuscha salmon were not significant prey despite far greater seasonal abundance. Strong selectivity for chinook salmon by resident killer whales probably has a significant influence on foraging tactics and seasonal movements, and also may have important implications for the conservation and management of both predator and prey. KEY WORDS: Prey choice · Food sharing · Foraging specialisation · Salmonid predation Full text in pdf format PreviousNextExport citation RSS - Facebook - Tweet - linkedIn Cited by Published in MEPS Vol. 316. Online publication date: July 03, 2006 Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599 Copyright © 2006 Inter-Research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational study of behavior: sampling methods
Altmann, J. (1974) · Behaviour · doi:10.1163/156853974x00534 · Cited by 13,891
Cited by
Estimating relative energetic costs of human disturbance to killer whales (Orcinus orca)
Williams, R., Lusseau, D., & Hammond, P. S. (2006) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.06.010 · Cited by 371
Alava, J. J. (2020) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2020.566101 · Cited by 113
Metadata
- Authors
- Ford, J., & Ellis, G.
- Venue
- Marine Ecology Progress Series
- Publisher
- Inter-Research Science Center
- Published
- 2006-07-03
- Volume
- 316
- Pages
- 185-199
- ISSN
- 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
- 1616-1599
- OpenAlex
- W2130133403
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selective foraging by fish-eating killer whales Orcinus orca in British Columbia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/meps316185
- The paper
- Ford, J., & Ellis, G. (2006). Selective foraging by fish-eating killer whales Orcinus orca in British Columbia. Marine Ecology Progress Series. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps316185
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.