The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global bathymetric patterns of standing stock and body size in the deep-sea benthos
Abstract
MEPS Marine Ecology Progress Series Contact the journal Facebook Twitter RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout the JournalEditorsTheme Sections MEPS 317:1-8 (2006) - doi:10.3354/meps317001 Global bathymetric patterns of standing stock and body size in the deep-sea benthos Michael A. Rex1,*, Ron J. Etter1, Jeremy S. Morris1, Jenifer Crouse1, Craig R. McClain2, Nicholas A. Johnson3, Carol T. Stuart1, Jody W. Deming4, Rebecca Thies1, Renee Avery1 1University of Massachusetts, Department of Biology, 100 Morrissey Blvd, Boston, Massachusetts 02125, USA 2Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, 7700 Sandholdt Rd, Moss Landing, California 95039, USA 3Committee on Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago, 1025 E. 57th St, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA 4University of Washington, School of Oceanography, Campus Box 357940, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA *Email: michael.rex@umb.edu ABSTRACT: We present the first global-scale analysis of standing stock (abundance and biomass) for 4 major size classes of deep-sea biota: bacteria, metazoan meiofauna, macrofauna and megafauna. The community standing stock decreases with depth; this is a universal phenomenon that involves a complex transition in the relative importance of the different size groups. Bacterial abundance and biomass show no decline with depth. All 3 animal size groups experience significant exponential decreases in both abundance and biomass. The abundance of larger animals is significantly lower and decreases more rapidly than for smaller groups. The resulting drop in average body size with depth confirms Thiel's size-structure hypothesis on very large spatial scales. In terms of their proportion of total community biomass, smaller size classes replace larger size classes. The upper continental slope is dominated by macrofaunal biomass, and the abyss by bacterial and meiofaunal biomass. The dramatic decrease in total community standing stock and the ascendancy of smaller organisms with depth has important implications for deep-sea biodiversity. The bathyal zone (200 to 4000 m) affords more ecological and evolutionary opportunity in the form of energy availability for larger organisms, and consequently supports higher macrofaunal and megafaunal species diversity than the abyss (>4000 m). KEY WORDS: Deep sea · Benthos · Abundance · Biomass · Body size · Biodiversity Full text in pdf format NextExport citation RSS - Facebook - Tweet - linkedIn Cited by Published in MEPS Vol. 317. Online publication date: July 18, 2006 Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599 Copyright © 2006 Inter-Research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The global ocean flux of particulate organic carbon: Areal distribution and magnitude
Jahnke, R. A. (1996) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/95gb03525 · Cited by 417
Macrobenthic community structure within and beneath the oxygen minimum zone, NW Arabian Sea
Levin, L. A., Gage, J. D., Martin, C., & Lamont, P. A. (2000) · Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography · doi:10.1016/s0967-0645(99)00103-4 · Cited by 236
Levin, L. A., Huggett, C. L., & Wishner, K. F. (1991) · Journal of Marine Research · doi:10.1357/002224091784995756 · Cited by 207 · cited 1×
“Deep-sea foraminiferans are an abundant, diverse and ecologically important group (Levin et al. 1991, Bernhard 1992, Gooday et al. 1998).”
Background
Cited by
The biomass distribution on Earth
Bar-On, Y. M., Phillips, R., & Milo, R. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1711842115 · Cited by 3,723
“This discrepancy is present even though both studies rely in large part on the same data source (89).”
Deep, diverse and definitely different: Unique attributes of the world’s largest ecosystem
Ramirez-Llodra, E., Brandt, A., Danovaro, R., De Mol, B., Escobar, E., German, C. R., Levin, L. A., Martinez Arbizu, P., Menot, L., Buhl-Mortensen, P., et al. (2010) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-7-2851-2010 · Cited by 913
Oxygen dynamics of marine sediments
Glud, R. N. (2008) · Marine Biology Research · doi:10.1080/17451000801888726 · Cited by 911
Kane, I. A., & Clare, M. A. (2019) · Frontiers in Earth Science · doi:10.3389/feart.2019.00080 · Cited by 476
Global Patterns and Predictions of Seafloor Biomass Using Random Forests
Wei, C.-L., Rowe, G. T., Escobar-Briones, E., Boetius, A., Soltwedel, T., Caley, M. J., Soliman, Y., Huettmann, F., Qu, F., Yu, Z., et al. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015323 · Cited by 441
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rex, M., Etter, R., Morris, J., Crouse, J., McClain, C., Johnson, N., Stuart, C., Deming, J., Thies, R., & Avery, R.
- Venue
- Marine Ecology Progress Series
- Publisher
- Inter-Research Science Center
- Published
- 2006-07-18
- Volume
- 317
- Pages
- 1-8
- ISSN
- 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
- 1616-1599
- OpenAlex
- W2089582139
- Cited by
- 475
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global bathymetric patterns of standing stock and body size in the deep-sea benthos. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/meps317001
- The paper
- Rex, M., Etter, R., Morris, J., Crouse, J., McClain, C., Johnson, N., Stuart, C., Deming, J., Thies, R., & Avery, R. (2006). Global bathymetric patterns of standing stock and body size in the deep-sea benthos. Marine Ecology Progress Series. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps317001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.