Cited by 71Marine Plankton and BiogeochemistryOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Climate forcing of the spring bloom in Chesapeake Bay.

Open access
Miller, WD, Harding Jr, LW·2007·Marine Ecology Progress Series

Abstract

Interannual variability of the spring phytoplankton bloom is strongly expressed in estuarine ecosystems such as Chesapeake Bay.Quantifying this variability is essential to resolve ecosystem responses to eutrophication from variability imposed by climate.We developed a 'synoptic climatology' from surface sea-level pressure (SLP) maps to categorize and quantify atmospheric circulation patterns and address climate forcing of phytoplankton dynamics in the Bay.The 10 patterns we identified had unique frequencies-of-occurrence and associated meteorological conditions (i.e.precipitation, temperature, wind speed and direction).Four measures of phytoplankton biomass, surface chlorophyll a (B), euphotic layer chlorophyll a (B eu ), water column chlorophyll a (B wc ), and total biomass (B tot ), were obtained from remotely sensed ocean color data spanning 16 yr (1989 to 2004) combined with concurrent shipboard data.Years with more frequent warm/wet weather patterns had spring blooms that reached peak biomass farther seaward in the estuary, were greater in magnitude, occurred later in the spring, and covered a larger area than years with a predominance of cool/dry weather patterns.Frequencies of winter weather patterns were used to forecast spring B, B eu , B wc , and B tot , explaining between 23 and 89% of the variance in the regional time-series.Residuals from these models did not show time-trends attributable to either accelerating eutrophication or management actions intended to decrease nutrient loadings.These findings extend our understanding of climatic influences on phytoplankton dynamics in the Bay by quantifying the effects of synoptic climate variability on spring bloom intensity, thereby supporting forecasts of seasonal phytoplankton biomass based on sub-continental scale weather patterns in this mid-Atlantic estuary.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3354/meps331011

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Miller, W., & Harding Jr, L.
Venue
Marine Ecology Progress Series
Published
2007-02-16
Volume
331
Pages
11-22
ISSN
  • 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-1599
OpenAlex
W2064050501
Cited by
70
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Marine Ecology Progress Series (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • Maryland Sea Grant, University of Maryland
  • NASA Headquarters
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine Plankton and Biogeochemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Keywords
spring bloom, radiative forcing, Chesapeake Bay, synoptic climatology, atmospheric circulation patterns, sea level pressure, chlorophyll a, euphotic layer, eutrophication, interannual variability, bloom prediction, weather patterns

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review