Cited by 110Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsVestibular and auditory disordersSpaceflight effects on biology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Combined Pitch and Roll and Cybersickness in a Virtual Environment

Bonato, Frederick, Bubka, Andrea, Palmisano, Stephen·2009·Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine

Abstract

Background Stationary subjects who perceive visually induced illusions of self-motion, or vection, in virtual reality (VR) often experience cybersickness, the symptoms of which are similar to those experienced during motion sickness. An experiment was conducted to test the effects of single and dual-axis rotation of a virtual environment on cybersickness. It was predicted that VR displays which induced illusory dual-axis (as opposed to single-axis) self-rotations in stationary subjects would generate more sensory conflict and subsequently more cybersickness. Methods There were 19 individuals (5 men, 14 women, mean age = 19.8 yr) who viewed the interior of a virtual cube that steadily rotated (at 60 degrees x s(-1)) about either the pitch axis or both the pitch and roll axes simultaneously. Subjects completed the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) before a trial and after 5 min of stimulus viewing. Results Post-treatment total SSQ scores and subscores for nausea, oculomotor, and disorientation were significantly higher in the dual-axis condition. Conclusions These results support the hypothesis that a vection-inducing VR stimulus that rotates about two axes generates more cybersickness compared to aVR stimulus that rotates about only one. In the single-axis condition, sensory conflict and pseudo-Coriolis effects may have led to symptoms. However, in the dual-axis condition, not only was perceived self-motion more complex (two axes compared to one), the inducing stimulus wa…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3357/asem.2394.2009

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 110

Metadata

Authors
Bonato, F., Bubka, A., & Palmisano, S.
Affiliations
Saint Peter's University (US)
Venue
Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine
Published
2009-11-01
Volume
80
Issue
11
Pages
941-945
ISSN
  • 0001-9402 (ISSN-L)
  • 0095-6562
OpenAlex
W2028390158
Cited by
110
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Spaceflight effects on biology
Keywords
cybersickness, virtual reality, vection, self-motion illusion, pitch rotation, roll rotation, sensory conflict, motion sickness, Simulator Sickness Questionnaire, nausea, disorientation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Aerospace Medicine, Female, Humans, Male, Motion Sickness, Severity of Illness Index, User-Computer Interface, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Combined Pitch and Roll and Cybersickness in a Virtual Environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3357/asem.2394.2009
The paper
Bonato, F., Bubka, A., & Palmisano, S. (2009). Combined Pitch and Roll and Cybersickness in a Virtual Environment. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.3357/asem.2394.2009