Cited by 54Spaceflight effects on biologyVestibular and auditory disordersCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders

Space Motion Sickness and Motion Sickness: Symptoms and Etiology

Thornton, William E., Bonato, Frederick·2013·Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine

Abstract

The adverse symptoms of space motion sickness (SMS) have remained problematic since the beginning of manned spaceflight. Despite over 50 yr of research SMS remains a problem that affects about half of all space travelers during the first 24-72 h of a spaceflight. SMS has been treated as another form of motion sickness (MS) despite distinct differences in symptomology. In this review SMS and MS differences are examined and documented based on available data. Vestibular biomechanics that occur during weightlessness coupled with theoretical assertions regarding human evolution have led us to propose a two-component model of SMS. The first component involves conflicting sensory signals inherent to the otolith organs that occur during weightlessness. The second component is a bimodal conflict between the otoliths and semicircular canals that can occur during normal head movements in weightlessness. Both components may inadvertently, and mistakenly, signal that a vestibular malfunction has occurred, hence initiating a protective mechanism that may produce symptoms that discourage activity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3357/asem.3449.2013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In weightless conditions of space flight, changed control of body orientation and vestibular alterations (otolith unloading) are extremely provocative during the first several days.

    “This changed control of the body and the alterations in vestibular function (unloading of the otolith organs) occurring in weightless conditions are extremely provocative during the first several days of space flight (Lackner and DiZio 1989, 2006; Lackner et al. 1991; Thornton and Bonato 2013).”

    From Motion sickness: more than nausea and vomiting (2014) · cites this paper as Thornton and Bonato 2013

  • During initial days of Skylab missions, astronauts became motion sick simply by making head and body movements.

    “During the initial days of the missions, the astronauts, however, did become motion sick simply by virtue of making head and body movements.”

    From Motion sickness: more than nausea and vomiting (2014) · cites this paper as Thornton and Bonato 2013

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thornton, W. E., & Bonato, F.
Affiliations
Montclair State University (US)
Venue
Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine
Published
2013-07-01
Volume
84
Issue
7
Pages
716-721
ISSN
  • 0001-9402 (ISSN-L)
  • 0095-6562
OpenAlex
W2043593259
Cited by
54
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Keywords
space motion sickness, motion sickness, microgravity, otolith organs, semicircular canals, sensory conflict, two-component model, etiology, clinical symptoms, human evolution, spaceflight
MeSH terms
Humans, Motion Sickness, Vestibular Diseases, Space Motion Sickness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review