Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 10Periodontal Regeneration and TreatmentsBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 93 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Regenerative Medicine in Orthopaedic Surgery: Pioneering Advances and Their Applications

Open access
Islam, Moh. Tawhidul, Bulut, Dilber, Sharabidze, Zuka·2025·EMJ Innovation

Abstract

Regenerative medicine has significantly impacted orthopaedic surgery by introducing biological therapies aimed at repairing, restoring, or replacing damaged musculoskeletal tissues. Recent advancements in stem cell therapies, platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and tissue engineering have paved the way for improved treatments for cartilage, bone, tendon, and ligament injuries. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) are gaining attention for their ability to regenerate tissues, while PRP shows promise in accelerating tendon and cartilage healing. Innovations in cartilage regeneration, including autologous chondrocyte implantation and biomimetic scaffolds, address the limitations of self-repair, and bone regeneration is being enhanced through growth factors like bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP) and synthetic grafts. In tendon and ligament repair, biological augmentation with scaffolds and growth factors is emerging as a novel approach. Moreover, regenerative approaches are making strides in spinal surgery and joint preservation, particularly in osteoarthritis treatment. However, challenges such as regulatory hurdles, cost, and the need for further clinical evidence remain. As the field progresses, the integration of cutting-edge techniques like 3D printing and gene therapy could further revolutionise orthopaedic regenerative medicine.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.33590/emjinnov/fgds3814

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 93 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Deng Y et al. 4D printed shape memory polyurethane-based composite for bionic cartilage scaffolds. ACS Appl Polym Mater. 2023;5(2):1283-92. · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Islam, M. T., Bulut, D., & Sharabidze, Z.
Affiliations
  • International Teaching University of Georgia (GE)
  • National Cancer Center of Georgia (GE)
Venue
EMJ Innovation
Published
2025-01-14
ISSN
2513-8634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406473394
Cited by
10
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5
FWCI
10.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
EMJ Innovation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Keywords
regenerative medicine, orthopedic surgery, stem cell therapy, platelet-rich plasma, tissue engineering, mesenchymal stem cells, induced pluripotent stem cells, cartilage regeneration, bone regeneration, tendon repair, ligament repair, autologous chondrocyte implantation, biomimetic scaffolds, bone morphogenetic proteins, osteoarthritis, spinal surgery, joint preservation, 3D printing, gene therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.