The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Agroecology: Science and Politics
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The term loosely refers to an ethnographic/ethnobotanical approach to traditional farming systems, lifting up their practical ecological-economic logic, with some similarities to Chayanovian farm-systems analysis (Rosset & Altieri, 2017).”
From Theories of Political Ecology: Monopoly Capital Against People and the Planet (2023) · cites this paper as Rosset & Altieri, 2017
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pathways for the amplification of agroecology
Nicholls, C. I., & Altieri, M. A. (2018) · Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.1080/21683565.2018.1499578 · Cited by 237
Self-citationAgroecology: challenges and opportunities for farming in the Anthropocene
Altieri, M. A., & Nicholls, C. (2020) · International Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources · doi:10.7764/ijanr.v47i3.2281 · Cited by 124
Self-citationSachet, E., Mertz, O., Le Coq, J.-F., Cruz-Garcia, G. S., Francesconi, W., Bonin, M., & Quintero, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2021.709401 · Cited by 89
Theories of Political Ecology: Monopoly Capital Against People and the Planet
Ajl, M. (2023) · Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1177/22779760221145232 · Cited by 48
Agroecological transitions: a mathematical perspective on a transdisciplinary problem
Ong, T. W. Y., & Liao, W. (2020) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2020.00091 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosset, P. M., & Altieri, M. A.
- Publisher
- PRACTICAL ACTION PUBLISHING
- Published
- 2017
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
