The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nattering on the Net: Women, Power, and Cybersapce
Abstract
From the Publisher: Dale Spender examines the multimedia boom and its implications in the areas of class, race and gender. She asks: Will the Internet create virtual sisterhood and how can we use it for good?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2006) · Cited by 2,256
Online incivility or sexual harassment? Conceptualising women's experiences in the digital age
Megarry, J. (2014) · Women's Studies International Forum · doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2014.07.012 · Cited by 295
Marriott *, N., Marriott, P., & Selwyn, N. (2004) · Accounting Education · doi:10.1080/0963928042000310823 · Cited by 62
Charting the Digital Literary Sphere
MURRAY, S. (2015) · Contemporary Literature · doi:10.3368/cl.56.2.311 · Cited by 38
Social Media: Social Intelligence Training Module
Robertson, M., Shoss, M. K., & Broom, M. A. (2016) · MedEdPORTAL · doi:10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10442 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Spender, D.
- Venue
- University of Toronto Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Toronto Press
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W1599364933
- Cited by
- 358
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 38.06
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nattering on the Net: Women, Power, and Cybersapce. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3138/9781442602762
- The paper
- Spender, D. (1996). Nattering on the Net: Women, Power, and Cybersapce. University of Toronto Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442602762
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
