Cited by 52Innovative Education and Learning PracticesAdult and Continuing Education TopicsOrganizational Learning and Leadership

Workplace 'learning' and adult education: Messy objects, blurry maps and making difference

Open access
Fenwick, Tara·2010·European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults

Abstract

This article reviews diverse representations of learning evident among published accounts of workplace learning across fields such as adult education, human resource development, management and organisation studies. The discussion critically addresses the question of how to mediate a multiplicity of definitional, ideological and purposive orientations. The argument here is that the issue is not perspectival, but ontological. The critical problem lies in mistaking learning as a single object when in fact it is enacted as multiple objects, as very different things in different logics of study and practice. Particularly in the contested arena of work as a site of economic conflict and production, learning needs to be appreciated as a messy object, existing in different states, or perhaps a series of different objects that are patched together through some manufactured linkages.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela0006

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Fenwick, T. & Rubenson, K. (2005). Taking stock: a review of research in learning in work 1999-2004. Proceedings of the International Researching Work and Learning Conference. Sydney: University of Technology Sydney.
  2. Fook, J. & Gardner, F. (2007). Practising critical reflection. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  3. Lahn, L. & Jensen, K. (2007). Models of professional learning: Exploring the epistemic tool perspective. Knowledge, Work and Society, 4(3), 63-82.
  4. Law, J. (2009). Multiplicity, Mess, and Modes of Enacting. Paper presented to Objects -What Matters? Technology, Value and Social Change Conference, University of Manchester (September 3 2009).
  5. Sawchuk, P. H. (2006). Activity and power. In P. Sawhcuk, N. Duarte, & M. Elhammoumi (Eds.), Critical perspectives on activity: Explorations across education, work and everyday Life (pp. 238- 268). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fenwick, T.
Affiliations
University of Stirling (GB)
Corresponding author
Fenwick, Tara
Venue
European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults
Published
2010-09-25
Volume
1
Issue
1-2
Pages
79-95
ISSN
2000-7426 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019284298
Cited by
52
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
9.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Pedocs (German Institute for International Educational Research) (submittedVersion)
  • peDOCS
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Adult and Continuing Education Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
Keywords
workplace learning, adult education, human resource development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review