The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tracking Firm Use of AI in Real Time: A Snapshot from the Business Trends and Outlook Survey
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Low adoption costs and the consumer focus of genAI products may explain why individual adoption is faster than official firm-wide adoption.
“Low adoption costs and the consumer focus of genAI products may also explain why individual adoption is faster than official firm-wide adoption (Babina, Fedyk, He, and Hodson, 2024; Bonney et al., 2024).”
From The Rapid Adoption of Generative AI (2024) · cites this paper as Bonney et al., 2024
Only 5.4 percent of firms had formally adopted genAI as of February 2024.
“Bonney et al. (2024) find that only 5.4 percent of firms had formally adopted genAI as of February 2024.”
From The Rapid Adoption of Generative AI (2024) · cites this paper as Bonney et al. (2024)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models
Eloundou, T., Manning, S., Mishkin, P., & Rock, D. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.10130 · Cited by 2,330
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Rapid Adoption of Generative AI
Bick, A., Blandin, A., & Deming, D. (2024) · NBER Working Paper · doi:10.3386/w32966 · Cited by 200
The Rapid Adoption of Generative AI
Bick, A., Blandin, A., & Deming, D. J. (2026) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2025.02523 · Cited by 48
Still Waters, Rapid Currents: Early Labor Market Transformation under Generative AI
Humlum, A., & Vestergaard, E. (2025) · doi:10.3386/w33777 · Cited by 68
Large Language Models, Small Labor Market Effects
Humlum, A., & Vestergaard, E. (2025) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5219933 · Cited by 27
Generative AI in Higher Education: Evidence from an Elite College
Contractor, Z., & Reyes, G. (2025) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5392712 · Cited by 19
Humlum, A., & Vestergaard, E. (2024) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4827166 · Cited by 9
Bao, H., Sun, M., & Teplitskiy, M. (2025) · Quantitative Science Studies · doi:10.1162/qss_a_00368 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Bonney, K., Breaux, C., Buffington, C., Dinlersoz, E., Foster, L., Goldschlag, N., Haltiwanger, J., Kroff, Z., & Savage, K.
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 2024-04
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 1
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
