The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Simple Macroeconomics of AI
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“If we assume an AI-exposure-adjusted labor share of 0.57, following Acemoglu (2024), the implied potential productivity gain is 1.1%.”
From The Rapid Adoption of Generative AI (2024) · cites this paper as Acemoglu (2024)
In the citing paper
“Our estimate of the potential aggregate productivity gain from genAI of 1.1% is slightly higher than the estimate of 0.7% found by Acemoglu (2024).”
From The Rapid Adoption of Generative AI (2024) · cites this paper as Acemoglu (2024)
In the citing paper
“Acemoglu (2024) uses expert assessments to estimate a wage-weighted share of all tasks for which genAI can be adopted of 4.6%.”
From The Rapid Adoption of Generative AI (2024) · cites this paper as Acemoglu (2024)
In the citing paper
“If we adjusted our estimate of labor cost savings from 33% down to the 27% from the experimental studies discussed in Acemoglu (2024), we would arrive at an aggregate productivity estimate of 0.9%.”
From The Rapid Adoption of Generative AI (2024) · cites this paper as Acemoglu (2024)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine
Friedman, J. H. (2001) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1013203451 · Cited by 30,731
Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings
Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D. (2011) · Handbook of Labor Economics · doi:10.1016/s0169-7218(11)02410-5 · Cited by 3,799
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2018) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20160696 · Cited by 3,121
GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models
Eloundou, T., Manning, S., Mishkin, P., & Rock, D. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.10130 · Cited by 2,330
The wrong kind of AI? Artificial intelligence and the future of labour demand
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2020) · Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society · doi:10.1093/cjres/rsz022 · Cited by 634
Applying AI to Rebuild Middle Class Jobs
Autor, D. (2024) · doi:10.3386/w32140 · Cited by 157
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Acemoglu, Daron, "AI's Future Doesn't Have to Be Dystopian.," Boston Review, 2021. https://www.bostonreview.net/forum/ais-future-doesnt-have-to-be-dystopian/.
- and , "Artificial Intelligence, Automation, and Work," The Economics of Artifical Intelligence: An Agenda, 2019, pp. 197-236.
- Edited by Ajay Agrawal, Joshua Gans and Avi Goldfarb. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.
- and , "Automation and New Tasks: How Technology Displaces and Reinstates Labor," Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2019, 33 (2), 3-30.
- and , "Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets," Journal of Political Economy, 2020, 128 (6), 2188-2244.
- and , "Tasks, Automation, and the Rise in US Wage Inequality," Econometrica, 2022, 90 (5), 1973-2016.
- Agrawal, Ajay, Joshua S Gans, and Avi Goldfarb, "Artificial Intelligence Adoption and System-Wide Change," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2023, pp. 1- 11.
- Caroline Chin, Anna Salomons, and Bryan Seegmiller, "New Frontiers: The Origins and Content of New Work, 1940-2018," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2024. Forthcoming. , Frank Levy, and Richard J Murnane, "The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2003, 118 (4), 1279-1333.
- Blei, David M, Andrew Y Ng, and Michael I Jordan, "Latent Dirichlet Allocation," Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2003, 3, 993-1022.
- Bresnahan, Timothy, "Artificial Intelligence Technologies and Aggregate Growth Prospects," Prospects for Economic Growth in the United States, 2019, pp. 132-172.
- Brynjolfsson, Erik, Daniel Rock, and Chad Syverson, "The Productivity J-curve: How Intangibles Complement General Purpose Technologies," American Economic Jour- nal: Macroeconomics, 2021, 13 (1), 333-372.
- Buera, Francisco J, Joseph P Kaboski, Richard Rogerson, and Juan I Vizcaino, "Skill-Biased Structural Change," The Review of Economic Studies, 2022, 89 (2), 592-625.
- Elsby, Michael WL, Bart Hobijn, and Ayşegül S ¸ahin, "The Decline of the US Labor Share," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2013, 2013 (2), 1-63.
- Greenwood, Jeremy and Mehmet Yorukoglu, "1974," Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1997, 46, 49-95.
- Hulten, Charles R, "Growth Accounting with Intermediate Inputs," The Review of Eco- nomic Studies, 1978, 45 (3), 511-518.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial intelligence risk management framework :
National Institute of Standards and Technology (US) (2024) · NIST Trustworthy and Responsible AI · doi:10.6028/nist.ai.600-1 · Cited by 274
The Rapid Adoption of Generative AI
Bick, A., Blandin, A., & Deming, D. (2024) · NBER Working Paper · doi:10.3386/w32966 · Cited by 200
Metadata
- Authors
- Acemoglu, D.
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 2024-05
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 6
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
