The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Empirical Analysis of Cigarette Addiction
Open accessAbstract
We use a framework suggested by a model of rational addiction to analyze empirically the demand for cigarettes.The data consist of per capita cigarettes sales (in packs) annually by state for the period 1955 through 1985.The empirical results provide support for the implications of a rational addiction model that cross price effects are negative (consumption in different periods are complements), that long-run price responses exceed short-run responses, and that permanent price effects exceed temporary price effects.A 10 percent permanent increase in the price of cigarettes reduces current consumption by 4 percent in the short run and by 7.5 percent in the long run.In contrast, a 10 percent increase in the price for only one period decreases consumption by only 3 percent.In addition, a one period price increase of 10 percent reduces consumption in the previous period by approximately .7 percent and consumption in the subsequent period by 1.5 percent.These estimates illustrate the importance of the intertemporal linkages in cigarette demand implied by rational addictive behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods
Granger, C. W. J. (1969) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912791 · Cited by 22,989
Specification Tests in Econometrics
Hausman, J. A. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913827 · Cited by 18,820
Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods
Granger, C. W. J. (2010) · Essays in Econometrics · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511753978.002 · Cited by 4,762
Cited by
Arellano, M. (2003) · doi:10.1093/0199245282.001.0001 · Cited by 2,108
Tobacco taxes as a tobacco control strategy
Chaloupka, F. J., Yurekli, A., & Fong, G. T. (2012) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050417 · Cited by 705
WHO IS ‘BEHAVIORAL’? COGNITIVE ABILITY AND ANOMALOUS PREFERENCES
Benjamin, D. J., Brown, S. A., & Shapiro, J. M. (2013) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1111/jeea.12055 · Cited by 690
Effectiveness of tax and price policies in tobacco control: Table 1
Chaloupka, F. J., Straif, K., & Leon, M. E. (2011) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tc.2010.039982 · Cited by 605
Panel Data Models: Some Recent Developments
Arellano, M., & Honoré, B. (2001) · Handbook of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s1573-4412(01)05006-1 · Cited by 561
Metadata
- Authors
- Becker, G., Grossman, M., & Murphy, K.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 1990-04
- OpenAlex
- W3125953654
- Cited by
- 920
- References
- 3
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Empirical Analysis of Cigarette Addiction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w3322
- The paper
- Becker, G., Grossman, M., & Murphy, K. (1990). An Empirical Analysis of Cigarette Addiction. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3322
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.