Cited by 705Smoking Behavior and CessationGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyEconomic and Fiscal Studies

Tobacco taxes as a tobacco control strategy

Open access
Chaloupka, Frank J, Yurekli, Ayda, Fong, Geoffrey T·2012·Tobacco Control

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increases in tobacco taxes are widely regarded as a highly effective strategy for reducing tobacco use and its consequences. METHODS: The voluminous literature on tobacco taxes is assessed, drawing heavily from seminal and recent publications reviewing the evidence on the impact of tobacco taxes on tobacco use and related outcomes, as well as that on tobacco tax administration. RESULTS: Well over 100 studies, including a growing number from low-income and middle-income countries, clearly demonstrate that tobacco excise taxes are a powerful tool for reducing tobacco use while at the same time providing a reliable source of government revenues. Significant increases in tobacco taxes that increase tobacco product prices encourage current tobacco users to stop using, prevent potential users from taking up tobacco use, and reduce consumption among those that continue to use, with the greatest impact on the young and the poor. Global experiences with tobacco taxation and tax administration have been used by WHO to develop a set of 'best practices' for maximising the effectiveness of tobacco taxation. CONCLUSIONS: Significant increases in tobacco taxes are a highly effective tobacco control strategy and lead to significant improvements in public health. The positive health impact is even greater when some of the revenues generated by tobacco tax increases are used to support tobacco control, health promotion and/or other health-related activities and programmes. In general, oppositional arguments that higher taxes will have harmful economic effects are false or overstated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050417

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tobacco taxes reduce initiation among youth, demand and consumption among current smokers, and relapse among former smokers.

    “Tobacco taxes reduce initiation among youth, demand and consumption among current smokers, and relapse among former smokers.5–10”

    From Seven-year tobacco tax plan in Ukraine: a case study of the actors, tactics and factors motivating policy passage (2022) · cites this paper as [6]

    The TAX, PRICE AND TOBACCO USE section says higher taxes and prices prevent initiation among young people, reduce overall demand, and reduce consumption among continuing users. It does not report that they reduce relapse among former smokers; a search for relapse found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Reviews copyright. on August 7, 2023 by guest. Protected by http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/ Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050417 on 16 February 2012. Downloaded from Reviews copyright. on August 7, 2023 by guest. Protected by http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/ Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050417 on 16 February 2012. Downloaded from Reviews copyright. on August 7, 2023 by guest. Protected by http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/ Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050417 on 16 February 2012. Downloaded from Reviews copyright. on August 7, 2023 by guest. Protected by http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/ Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050417 on 16 February 2012. Downloaded from Reviews copyright. on August 7, 2023 by guest. Protected by http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/ Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050417 on 16 February 2012. Downloaded from REFERENCES
  2. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention, Tobacco Control, Volume 14: Effectiveness of Tax and Price Policies in Tobacco Control. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2011. http://www.iarc.fr/en/publications/list/handbooks/ Reviews copyright. on August 7, 2023 by guest. Protected by http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/ Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050417 on 16 February 2012. Downloaded from
  3. Joossens L, Merriman D, Ross H, et al. How Eliminating the Global Illicit Cigarette Trade Would Increase Tax Revenue and Save Lives. Paris: The International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2009. PAGE fraction trail=8.5 180 Tobacco Control 2012;21:172e180. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050417
  4. Reviews copyright. on August 7, 2023 by guest. Protected by http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/ Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050417 on 16 February 2012. Downloaded from REFERENCES
  5. McNabola A, Gill LW. The control of secondhand smoke: a policy review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2009;6:741e58.
  6. Brownson RC, Figgs LW, Caisley LE. Epidemiology of secondhand smoke exposure. Oncogene 2002;21:7341e8.
  7. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Tobacco Smoke and Involuntary Smoking. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. vol. 83. Lyon, France: IARC, 2004.
  8. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Some Industrial Chemicals and Dyestuffs. Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. vol. 29. Lyon, France: IARC, 1982.
  9. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention, Tobacco Control: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Smoke-Free Policies. vol. 13. Lyon, France: IARC, 2009.
  10. Kabir Z, Manning PJ, Holohan J, et al. Active smoking and secondhand- smoke exposure at home among Irish children, 1995e2007. Arch Dis Child 2010;95:42e5.
  11. Soliman S, Pollack HA, Warner KE. Decrease in the prevalence of secondhand smoke exposure in the home during the 1990s in families with children. Am J Public Health 2004;94:314e20.
  12. Matt GE, Quintana PJ, Hovell MF, et al. Households contaminated by secondhand smoke: sources of infant exposures. Tob Control 2004;13:29e37.
  13. Invernizzi G, Ruprecht A, De Marco C, et al. Residual tobacco smoke: measurement of its washout time in the lung and of its contribution to secondhand smoke. Tob Control 2007;16:29e33.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chaloupka, F. J., Yurekli, A., & Fong, G. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Chaloupka, Frank J
Venue
Tobacco Control
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2012-02-16
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
172-180
ISSN
  • 0964-4563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3318
OpenAlex
W2041827408
Cited by
705
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Tobacco Control (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Fiscal Studies
Keywords
tobacco excise tax, tobacco use reduction, economic effects of taxation, low- and middle-income countries
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Commerce, Health Promotion, Humans, Smoking, Taxes, Smoking Cessation, Tobacco Industry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review