PreprintCited by 2Higher Education Research StudiesFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisPolitics, Economics, and Education Policy

Student Loan Forgiveness

Open access
Dinerstein, Michael, Earnest, Samuel, Koustas, Dmitri, Yannelis, Constantine·2025·NBER Working Paper Series

Abstract

Student loan forgiveness has been proposed as a means to alleviate soaring student loan burdens.This paper uses administrative credit bureau data to study the distributional, consumption, borrowing, and employment effects of the largest event of student loan forgiveness in history.Beginning in March 2021, the United States federal government ordered $132 billion in student loans cancelled, or 7.8%of the total $1.7 trillion in outstanding student debt.We estimate that forgiven borrowers' predicted monthly earnings were $115 higher than borrowers who did not receive forgiveness and $193 more than the general population.We find that student loan forgiveness led to increases in mortgage, auto, and credit card debt by 9 cents for every dollar forgiven.Borrowers' monthly earnings and employment fell, at increasing rates for each month post forgiveness.The implied Marginal Propensities for Consumption (MPC) and Earnings (MPE) are 0.27 and -0.49, respectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w33462

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

7 of 30 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Interpretationown data

    Student debt forgiveness has a much larger MPC than mortgage balance reductions or stock appreciation.

    “Compared to mortgage balance reductions (Agarwal et al., 2017) or stock appreciation (Chodorow-Reich et al., 2021; Di Maggio et al., 2020), student debt forgiveness has a much larger MPC.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Agarwal et al., 2017

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Chodorow-Reich et al., 2021 source
    • cites Di Maggio et al., 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Premisecitation

    Consumption and spending can differ dramatically when households respond by making expensive durable purchases.

    “When considering consumption responses, an important distinction is the difference between consumption and spending, which can differ dramatically when households respond by making expensive durable purchases.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Laibson et al., 2022 source
  • Findingown data

    Student loan forgiveness leads to decreased earnings.

    “For labor market outcomes, we estimate that forgiveness leads to decreased earnings and increased switching across industries, with effects increasing over time.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Biden's proposed forgiveness would have produced more progressive forgiveness than the actual policy.

    “We estimate that Biden's proposal would have produced more progressive forgiveness, with the average forgiven dollar accruing to a borrower with $4,868 in predicted monthly income compared to the $5,562 of the actual policy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    The marginal propensity for consumption from student loan forgiveness is 0.27.

    “Adding up the effects, we estimate a marginal propensity for consumption of 0.27 and a marginal propensity for earnings of -0.49.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 59
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 49
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 6
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The MPC of 0.27 is similar to the baseline estimate from Boehm et al. (2025) but much smaller than MPCs for expiring transfers.

    “Compared to transitory transfers, our MPC of 0.27 is similar to the baseline estimate from Boehm et al. (2025) but much smaller than MPCs for expiring transfers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Boehm et al. (2025) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the large literature estimating the MPC from small, transitory shocks, most such shocks are around $500 and are typically assumed not to have wealth effects.

    “In the large literature estimating the Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) from small, transitory shocks, most such shocks are around $500 and are typically assumed not to have wealth effects”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Jappelli and Pistaferri, 2010 source
    • cites Boehm et al., 2024 source

      The Introduction and Related literature sections describe extensive research on MPCs and the paper’s focus on transitory transfers; the Experimental Design section specifies a 300-euro transfer. Our copy does not establish that most shocks studied in the literature are around $500 or that they are typically assumed to have no wealth effects. Page numbers are unavailable in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The estimator from De Chaisemartin and d'Haultfoeuille (2024) coincides numerically with the estimator from Callaway and Sant'Anna (2021) because the treatment is binary absorbing and all borrowers begin without treatment.

    “We use the estimator from De Chaisemartin and d'Haultfoeuille (2024), though because we have a binary absorbing treatment and all borrowers begin the sample without treatment, the estimator coincides numerically with the estimator from Callaway and Sant'Anna (2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites De Chaisemartin and d'Haultfoeuille (2024)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Callaway and Sant'Anna (2021) source

      Section 2.1 (page unavailable) assumes binary treatment, no treatment in the first period, and treatment that remains on after adoption. But the Introduction compares the authors’ approach only with de Chaisemartin and D’Haultfœuille (2020); our copy does not establish numerical equivalence with the 2024 estimator under those conditions. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    In the case of student loan forgiveness, the precise value of the shock to lifetime wealth is known, allowing the approach of annuitizing the forgiveness over the remaining lifetime.

    “In the case of student loan forgiveness, we know the precise value of the shock to lifetime wealth, allowing us to follow the approach taken in the literature on lottery windfalls annuitizing the forgiveness over the remaining lifetime”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Imbens et al., 2001 source
    • cites Cesarini et al., 2017 source

      The Model Setup (p. 19) treats a lottery prize as a known, one-time wealth shock, and the lifetime analysis (p. 23) projects its effects over the winner’s remaining years of life. These passages support using a lifetime framework, but they do not describe annuitizing the prize value over those years; the paper does not address student-loan forgiveness. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Golosov et al., 2023 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Spending responses including durable purchases are estimates of the MPX, which will exceed estimates of the MPC.

    “Spending responses including durable purchases are estimates of the MPX, which will exceed estimates of the MPC (Laibson et al., 2022).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Laibson et al., 2022 source

      Section 4.1 (p. 16) says the MPX will typically be greater than the MPC because durable expenditure is front-loaded relative to durable consumption. Section 4.2 (p. 17) adds that the MPC converges to the MPX over longer horizons. The claim correctly identifies spending responses including durable purchases as MPXs, but its unqualified 'will exceed' overstates the paper's qualified comparison. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Labor market effects of forgiveness are largest for younger workers with lower earnings, hourly workers, and public service workers.

    “Labor market effects are largest for younger workers with lower earnings, hourly workers, and public service workers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    Student loan delinquencies fall mechanically after forgiveness.

    “We find little to no effect on non-student loan delinquencies, although student loan delin-quencies fall mechanically.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The pattern of inferred forgiveness tracks reported forgiveness both over time and across US states.

    “The pattern of inferred forgiveness tracks reported forgiveness both over time and across US states.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Forgiven borrowers have no baseline differences and no pretrends in their beliefs about forgiveness.

    “Appendix A reexamines a survey of beliefs about forgiveness from Koustas et al. (2024) and finds forgiven borrowers have no baseline differences and no pretrends in their beliefs about forgiveness.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Koustas et al. (2024)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    Borrowers who receive forgiveness tend to have slightly higher levels of other types of household debt.

    “Consequently, these borrowers tend to have lower levels of student loan debt, and slightly higher levels of other types of household debt.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The majority of the increase in non-student debt, $2,320, is driven by increases in mortgage balances, while the remainder is equally split between auto and credit card balances.

    “The majority of this increase, $2,320, is driven by increases in mortgage balances, while the remainder is equally split between auto and credit card balances.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Median annualized earnings are around $50,000 for both student loan borrowers and forgiven borrowers.

    “Median earnings on an annualized basis are around $50,000 for both groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There is more forgiveness for earlier cohorts, which had greater eligibility for loan discharge under PSLF and IDR.

    “We show that there is more forgiveness for earlier cohorts, which had greater eligibility for loan discharge under PSLF and IDR”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Positive earnings gaps persist between forgiven borrowers and various comparison groups when using actual earnings rather than predicted earnings.

    “We see that positive earnings gaps persist between forgiven borrowers and various comparison groups.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Conditional on having reported earnings, monthly earnings of student loan borrowers are around $4,700, compared to around $5,700 for forgiven student loan borrowers.

    “Conditional on having reported earnings, monthly earnings of student loan borrowers are around $4,700, or $56,400 on an annualized basis, compared to around $5,700 for forgiven student loan borrowers, or $68,400 on an annualized basis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The modal forgiven borrower had a low balance, but many had balances above $20,000 or $30,000.

    “The modal forgiven borrower had a low balance, but many had balances above $20,000 or $30,000.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Prior to 2021, forgiveness rates were below 1.5%, and the more recent period, especially 2023, has much higher rates.

    “In Appendix Figure C.1, we show that prior to 2021, forgiveness rates were below 1.5%, and that this more recent period, especially 2023, has much higher rates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    Borrowers who receive forgiveness tend to have lower levels of student loan debt.

    “Consequently, these borrowers tend to have lower levels of student loan debt, and slightly higher levels of other types of household debt.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There are few effects on delinquencies, except a statistically significant but very small increase in credit card delinquencies.

    “There are few effects on delinquencies, except a statistically significant but very small increase in credit card delinquencies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Thirty-eight percent of forgiven borrowers are employed at a possible public sector employer, compared with 31 percent of overall borrowers and 22 percent of individuals without student debt.

    “Thirty-eight percent of forgiven borrowers are employed at a possible public sector employer, compared with 31 percent of overall borrowers and just 22 percent of individuals without student debt.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Using the estimated consumption and earnings responses from the sixth month post-forgiveness, α = 1.11 and the paper fails to reject α = 1.

    “We estimate α = 1.11 and fail to reject α = 1.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The paper ignores precautionary savings considerations.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The estimates by imputed program type show some differences-larger mortgage debt responses for forgiveness under Permanent Disability and Borrower Defense-but are qualitatively similar across all four programs.

    “While we estimate some differences -larger mortgage debt responses for forgiveness under Permanent Disability and Borrower Defense -the estimates are qualitatively similar across all four programs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The timing of the forgiveness event is a valid proxy for which program generated the forgiveness.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There is an increase in switching industries, and especially switching out of industries associated with public service.

    “We estimate an increase in switching industries, and especially switching out of industries associated with public service.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The increase in industry switching is more than 10% of the baseline switching rate, while the outflow from public service jobs is statistically significant but small.

    “The increase in industry switching is more than 10% of the baseline switching rate, while the outflow from public service jobs is statistically significant but small.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There are positive effects on mortgage, auto, and credit card balances for all programs, and statistically significant for all but auto loans for Disability and Borrower Defense.

    “We estimate positive effects on mortgage, auto, and credit card balances for all programs, and statistically significant for all but auto loans for Disability and Borrower Defense.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The timing of the forgiveness event is a valid proxy for which program generated the forgiveness.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The first-stage coefficients of servicer leniency on the probability of receiving forgiveness are quite close to 1, and the first-stage F-statistics all exceed 8,000.

    “Coefficients are quite close to 1, and the first stage F-statistics all exceed 8,000.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The increase in credit card lines is largely driven by additional credit cards, while the mortgage and auto results come from opening a first mortgage or auto loan.

    “While the increase in credit card lines is largely driven by additional credit cards, the mortgage and auto results come from opening a first mortgage or auto loan.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The time path of labor market effects differs from the credit outcome effects, which were fairly steady by 6 months post-forgiveness.

    “This time path differs from the credit outcome effects, which were fairly steady by 6 months post-forgiveness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Neither the missing down payments assumption nor including the extensive margin of employment meaningfully affects the estimate of α.

    “Neither of these changes meaningfully affects our estimate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    In the full sample, the MPC is 0.272 (SE 0.061).

    “Full sample | 0.272 * * * | -0.489 * * | -0.117 * * | 0.762 * * * | 0.644 * * *”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Over a 12-month horizon after forgiveness, forgiven borrowers' mortgage balances and payments due increase.

    “Dynamic DID 2845.056* * * 23.321 * * * -0.000”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Absent forgiveness, forgiven borrowers and the comparison borrowers (those not yet forgiven or never forgiven in sample) would have followed parallel trends in the outcomes studied.
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    The reduced-form MPE (positive earnings) estimate is -44.276 (SE 13.030).

    “MPE | -44.276 * * * | -0.002 * * * | -0.489 * * | -0.875 * * *”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    The reduced-form MPC (mortgage+auto+CC balances) estimate is 27.609 (SE 474.467).

    “MPC | 27.609 * * * | 0.001 * * * | 0.272 * * * | 0.573 * * *”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Student loan forgiveness increases forgiven borrowers' credit card payments due.

    “| Dynamic DID | 222.048 * * * | 5.337 * * * | 0.004 * * |”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Absent forgiveness, forgiven borrowers and the comparison borrowers (those not yet forgiven or never forgiven in sample) would have followed parallel trends in the outcomes studied.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    The paper takes a random 25% sample of these borrowers, yielding a data set containing just under 1 million borrowers.

    “we then take a random 25% sample of these borrowers which yields a data set containing just under 1 million borrowers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Student loan forgiveness increases forgiven borrowers' auto loan payments due.

    “| Dynamic DID | 232.043 * * * | 4.804 * * * | 0.000 |”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Absent forgiveness, forgiven borrowers and the comparison borrowers (those not yet forgiven or never forgiven in sample) would have followed parallel trends in the outcomes studied.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The algorithm identifies that 333, or 7.4%, of respondents ever receive forgiveness, which is a similar forgiveness rate among the respondents to the overall population.

    “Our algorithm identifies that 333, or 7.4%, of respondents, ever receive forgiveness, which is a similar forgiveness rate among the respondents to the overall population.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The initial filters remove approximately 10% of the original sample.

    “These initial filters remove approximately 10% of the original sample.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Baseline beliefs about forgiveness are around 30 percent in the period prior to the Supreme Court decision in June 2023, and still around 20 percent after the decision at the date of the last survey in July 2023 (with higher beliefs at longer horizons).

    “baseline beliefs about forgiveness are around 30 percent in the period prior to the Supreme Court decision in June 2023, and still around 20 percent after the decision at the date of the last survey in July 2023 (with higher beliefs at longer horizons).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The reduced-form MPE (earnings including 0s) estimate is -45.044 (SE 12.923).

    “MPE | -45.044 * * * | -0.002 * * * | -0.510 * * * | -0.966 * * *”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The results indicate that loan forgiveness increases consumption in the short term, with sharp increases in mortgage, auto, and credit card debt following loan forgiveness.

    “The results indicate that loan forgiveness increases consumption in the short term, with sharp increases in mortgage, auto, and credit card debt following loan forgiveness.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    The final sample is approximately 4 million active student loan borrowers.

    “This leaves us with a final sample of approximately 4 million active student loan borrowers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The two-way fixed effects estimates are similar to the dynamic DID estimates, with small differences likely because the comparison group includes mostly borrowers who do not receive forgiveness during the sample.

    “We include the two-way fixed effects estimates for comparison, and find that differences are small, likely because the comparison group includes mostly borrowers who do not receive forgiveness during our sample.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Average gross compensation in 2023, conditional on working the full year, was $90,387.

    “Average gross compensation in 2023, conditional on working the fullyear, was $90,387.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Estimates for the period out to 12 months post-forgiveness continue to increase in magnitude, though the panel becomes relatively unbalanced.

    “In Appendix Table C.9 we show estimates for the period out to 12 months post-forgiveness and find them continuing to increase in magnitude, but we again suggest caution in interpreting the results as the panel becomes relatively unbalanced.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    62.7% of the employment workforce are paid hourly, and 31.1% are salaried (6.2% have missing information).

    “62.7 percent of the employment workforce are paid hourly, and 31.1 percent are salaried (6.2 percent have missing information).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The distribution of 2-digit NAICS in the employment records is broadly similar to the overall NAICS distribution, with a few exceptions.

    “We find the distribution to be broadly similar to the overall NAICS distribution, with a few exceptions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The employment records contain around 71% of average annual earnings compared to the CPS, likely due to incomplete coverage of annual employment.

    “Comparing the means, the employment records contain around 71% of average annual earnings, likely due to its incomplete coverage of annual employment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Changes to PSLF marked significant breaks from past program implementation and were likely not broadly anticipated.

    “Similarly, changes to PSLF marked significant breaks from past program implementation and were likely not broadly anticipated.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The cancellation of the student debt balance is permanent and of a precise amount, analogous to lottery windfalls.

    “the cancellation of the student debt balance is permanent and of a precise amount, analogous to lottery windfalls.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Many forgiveness policies are responses to economic crises or recessions, whereas this policy occurred at a time of economic stability.

    “First, many forgiveness policies are responses to economic crises or recessions.This policy, instead, is occurring at a time of economic stability, especially toward the end of our sample.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The decreased earnings suggests that borrowers may have been in higher-paying jobs or provided increased labor supply in part to pay back debt.

    “The decreased earnings suggests that borrowers may have been in higher-paying jobs or provided increased labor supply in part to pay back debt.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Many forgiveness policies target borrowers with very specific characteristics, whereas this policy is relatively broad-based.

    “Second, many forgiveness policies target borrowers with very specific characteristics (e.g., teachers or borrowers in default).This policy, instead, is relatively broad-based.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Most servicers do not regularly report payment counts to borrowers, so there was little scope for borrowers to obtain information on how close they were to discharge.

    “Moreover, most servicers do not regularly report payment counts to borrowers, so there was little scope for borrowers to obtain information on how close they were to discharge.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Even compared to other borrowers with student debt, those who receive forgiveness are positively selected on income and are not necessarily the ones in the most financial distress.

    “Thus, even compared to other borrowers with student debt, those who receive forgiveness are positively selected on income and are not necessarily the ones in the most financial distress.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Rothstein and Rouse (2011) argue that student borrowers need to earn more to meet payments, and hence will work longer hours or select into higher paying jobs.

    “Rothstein and Rouse (2011) argue that student borrowers need to earn more to meet payments, and hence will work longer hours or select into higher paying jobs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rothstein and Rouse (2011)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Relative to a variety of comparison groups, forgiven borrowers are selected on having higher earnings and higher predicted earnings.

    “Thus, relative to a variety of comparison groups, forgiven borrowers are selected on having higher earnings and higher predicted earnings.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Unlike winning the lottery, loan forgiveness does not provide an up-front windfall; however, it similarly frees up cash flow in the budget constraint that can be used for other purposes.

    “Unlike winning the lottery, loan forgiveness does not provide an up-front windfall; however, it similarly frees up cash flow in the budget constraint that can be used for other purposes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    These differences partly reflect lifecycle effects but still remain large when comparing individuals of the same age.

    “These differences partly reflect lifecycle effects but still remain large when comparing individuals of the same age.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The comparison group consists of borrower groups who have not yet received forgiveness, and because forgiveness is relatively rare, the comparison group is dominated by borrowers who have never received forgiveness.

    “Our comparison group consists of borrower groups who have not yet received forgiveness, and because forgiveness is a relatively rare event our comparison group is dominated by borrowers who have never received forgiveness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    This mechanism would predict loan forgiveness lowers earnings.

    “This mechanism would predict loan forgiveness lowers earnings, as students would no longer need higher earnings to make loan payments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Some servicers may interact more directly with Federal relief programs or be more careful about recording borrowers' eligibility for forgiveness programs, such that borrowers randomly assigned to these servicers are differentially likely to receive forgiveness.

    “Some servicers may interact more directly with Federal relief programs or be more careful about recording borrowers' eligibility for forgiveness programs such that borrowers randomly assigned to these servicers are differentially likely to receive forgiveness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Empirical studies, usually focusing on small groups of borrowers, have found positive, negative or no effects of student debt on earnings.

    “Empirical studies, usually focusing on small groups of borrowers, have found positive, negative or no effects of student debt on earnings”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Yannelis and Tracey, 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The paper's estimates of forgiveness closely align with policy announcements, suggesting they are accurately measuring loan forgiveness following new policies.

    “The figure shows that our estimates of forgiveness closely align with policy announcements, which suggests that we are accurately measuring loan forgiveness following new policies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    PSLF locks some borrowers into public service jobs to obtain forgiveness, and the forgiveness event may release these constraints.

    “PSLF lock some borrowers into public service jobs to obtain forgiveness, and the forgiveness event may release these constraints.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The implemented forgiveness is relatively regressive and suggests that there was room for more progressive policies.

    “These results show that the implemented forgiveness is relatively regressive and suggests that there was room for more progressive policies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This mechanism could increase or decrease earnings depending on whether public service jobs are lower paying than alternatives or require living in higher cost of living metro areas.

    “This mechanism could increase or decrease earnings depending on whether public service jobs are lower paying than alternatives or require living in higher cost of living metro areas”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Clustering at the borrowing cohort generates smaller standard errors than clustering at the forgiveness cohort, suggesting that the baseline clustering may be conservative.

    “We indeed find that this form of clustering generates smaller standard errors and that our baseline clustering may be conservative.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The timing of the policies separates borrowers who are subject to common shocks, justifying clustering at the forgiveness cohort level.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    If borrowers had incorporated these beliefs into pre-forgiveness decisions about consumption or labor supply, then the responses to forgiveness would be based on the difference in the wealth shock and the expected wealth shock.

    “If borrowers had incorporated these beliefs into pre-forgiveness decisions about consumption or labor supply, then the responses to forgiveness would be based on the difference in the wealth shock and the expected wealth shock.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The reduction in payments due is likely the most relevant denominator for hand-to-mouth or rule-of-thumb consumers.

    “This is likely the most relevant denominator for hand-to-mouth or rule-of-thumb consumers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The labor supply response may be a combination of working less and switching to lower-wage jobs.

    “The labor supply response may be a combination of working less and switching to lower-wage jobs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The MPX, MPC, and MPE estimates appear broadly in line with other recent estimates in the literature.

    “Our estimates appear broadly in line with other recent estimates in the literature.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The estimates are only partial-equilibrium but provide some insight on the macroeconomic implications of broad-scale forgiveness.

    “While our estimates are only partial-equilibrium, they provide some insight on the macroeconomic implications of broad-scale forgiveness.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Households spend 27.4 to 57.5 times the monthly wealth shock, as households front-load spending on durables like housing.

    “In other words, households spend 27.4 to 57.5 times the monthly wealth shock, as households front-load spending on durables like housing.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The outflow from public service jobs may reflect job lock related to PSLF, as forgiven borrowers no longer need to work in public service to qualify for future forgiveness.

    “This latter effect may reflect job lock related to PSLF, as forgiven borrowers no longer need to work in public service to qualify for future forgiveness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The larger earnings effects for public service workers are consistent with the earlier drop in public service workers seen in Table 7 and likely reflect workers leaving public service.

    “This is consistent with the earlier drop in public service workers seen in Table 7, and likely reflect workers leaving public service.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The typical borrower has about 41 years of remaining life expectancy.

    “the typical borrower has about 41 years of remaining life expectancy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The similarity in estimates across programs might imply that the effects are driven by economic channels, such as wealth effects, that are common to forgiveness under all of the programs.

    “The similarity in estimates might imply that the effects are driven by economic channels, such as wealth effects, that are common to forgiveness under all of the programs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The timing of the forgiveness event is a valid proxy for which program generated the forgiveness.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The panel becomes somewhat imbalanced as the post-forgiveness period is extended, such that earlier forgiveness cohorts contribute larger weight to the estimated effects.

    “We caution, though, that our panel becomes somewhat imbalanced as we extend the post-forgiveness period such that earlier forgiveness cohorts contribute larger weight to the estimated effects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning

    The MPX is the relevant estimate for understanding the macroeconomic effects, since they align with the timing of expenditure for GDP calculations.

    “In addition, the MPX is the relevant estimate for understanding the macroeconomic effects, since they align with the timing of expenditure for GDP calculations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Large-scale forgiveness is more likely to have general equilibrium effects, and the overall economic benefits for the economy will likely depend on how the forgiveness is financed by the government.

    “Large-scale forgiveness, however, is more likely to have general equilibrium effects, and the overall economic benefits for the economy will likely to depend on how the forgiveness is financed by the government.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The increased balances on non-student debt could reflect borrowers opening new lines of credit or increased use of credit on existing lines.

    “The increased balances on non-student debt could reflect borrowers opening new lines of credit (e.g., a new mortgage or financing a new car) or increased use of credit on existing lines.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Debt overhang arises from a shift in incentives when borrowers are close to discharge, either through bankruptcy or other forgiveness, and a reduction in earnings due to those being paid to creditors.

    “Debt overhang arises from a shift in incentives when borrowers are close to discharge, either through bankruptcy or other forgiveness, and a reduction in earnings due to those being paid to creditors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Di Maggio et al. (2019)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Donaldson et al., 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    If reaching new levels of consumption or labor supply require adjustments that take time to make, then estimates that pool over months 0 to 6 post-forgiveness may understate the long-run response.

    “First, if there are reaching new levels of consumption or labor supply require adjustments that take time to make, then our estimates that pool over months 0 to 6 post-forgiveness may understate the long-run response.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The permanent income hypothesis implies that rational consumers should change their behavior based on their expectations about future forgiveness.

    “The permanent income hypothesis (PIH) implies that rational consumers should change their behavior based on their expectations about future forgiveness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The paper employs various cleaning methods to ensure a clean and accurate sample.

    “we employ various cleaning methods to ensure a clean and accurate sample.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The decreases in earnings and the probability of being employed after forgiveness may reflect standard wealth effects and a lower need for immediate earnings to pay back debt.

    “The decreases in earnings and the probability of being employed may reflect standard wealth effects, as well a lower need for immediate earnings to pay back debt.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    To validate the forgiveness classification, the paper hand-collects forgiveness statistics from Department of Education press releases.

    “To validate our forgiveness classification we hand-collect forgiveness statistics from Department of Education (DOE) press releases.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Credit bureau data can often contain measurement error, fragmented records, reporting lags, and stale information.

    “Because credit bureau data can often contain measurement error, fragmented records, reporting lags, and stale information (Gibbs et al., 2023)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gibbs et al., 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Liquidity effects might predict deviations from perfect smoothing of the wealth shock.

    “Liquidity effects might predict deviations from perfect smoothing of the wealth shock.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Loan forgiveness at the state level is limited only to forgiveness resulting from IDR payment count adjustments and PSLF.

    “Loan forgiveness at the state level is limited only to forgiveness resulting from IDR payment count adjustments and PSLF.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Koustas et al. (2024) also present suggestive evidence that households with the most optimistic expectations may be holding back on durable goods purchases while they wait for uncertainty to resolve, which would overstate durable MPCs.

    “On the other hand, they also present some suggestive evidence that households with the most optimistic expectations may be holding back on durable goods purchases while they wait for uncertainty to resolve, which would overstate durable MPCs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Koustas et al. (2024)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    There is a large body of empirical evidence from other contexts that households do not respond until the actual receipt of income.

    “There is also a large body of empirical evidence from other contexts that households do not respond until the actual receipt of income.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The paper interprets its results as having no baseline differences and no pretend between those that get forgiveness and those that do not, consistent with these forgiveness events being a surprise event.

    “In general, we interpret our results as having no baseline differences and no pretend between those that get forgiveness and those that do not, consistent with these forgiveness events being a”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Standard errors in the estimates are clustered by forgiveness cohort.

    “Standard errors are clustered by forgiveness cohort and are presented in parentheses below each estimate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The paper winsorizes balances and payments at the 99% level because the data contains extreme, likely erroneous, outliers.

    “Additionally, we winsorize balances and payments at the 99% level as the data contains extreme, likely erroneous, outliers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The increase in credit card usage on already-open lines explains about half of the overall treatment effect, while the effects on mortgages and auto loans move in the opposite direction of the total effect.

    “This effect for credit cards explains about half of the overall treatment effect, while the effects on mortgages and auto loans move in the opposite direction of the total effect.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    With a balanced panel, defining groups at the individual level (akin to individual fixed effects) yields numerically identical estimates.

    “Our balanced panel means that if we were to define groups at the individual level, akin to using individual fixed effects, the estimates are numerically identical.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The proposed forgiveness would have targeted individuals with higher average earnings, especially when considering the non-student borrower population.

    “However, it is still worth noting that the proposed forgiveness would have targeted individuals with higher average earnings, especially when considering the non-student borrower population.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The TransUnion data slightly underestimate both borrowers and debt amounts.

    “It is expected that the TransUnion data would slightly underestimates both borrowers and debt amounts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
100 of 100
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The parallel trends assumption holds for the dynamic difference-in-differences design: absent forgiveness, outcomes of forgiven and not-yet-forgiven borrowers would have evolved similarly.

    “We compare how a borrower's outcomes change over time upon receiving forgiveness, relative to borrowers who have not yet received forgiveness.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The instrumental variable based on loan servicers' propensity to process forgiveness affects borrower outcomes only through forgiveness.

    “We use the fact that loan servicers are quasi-randomly assigned (Cornaggia and Xia, 2024).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The vast majority of student loan borrowers in the United States take government loans.

    “The vast majority of student loan borrowers in the United States take government loans, and hence private borrowers are likely a different sample.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The exclusion restriction for the IV analysis holds: servicers only affect forgiveness probabilities and not other factors related to borrower outcomes.

    “Interpreting these estimates as a causal treatment effect of receiving forgiveness relies on a potentially strong exclusion restriction that servicers only affect forgiveness probabilities and not other factors related to borrower outcomes.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The timing of the policies separates borrowers who are subject to common shocks, justifying clustering at the forgiveness cohort level.

    “In our main analysis, we cluster at the forgiveness cohort level, under the assumption that the timing of the policies (Appendix Table B.1) separates borrowers who are subject to common shocks.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The timing of the forgiveness event is a valid proxy for which program generated the forgiveness.

    “We thus use the timing of the forgiveness event as a proxy for which program generated it.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Public sector employees are more likely to receive forgiveness under PSLF.

    “For earnings, we focus on public sector employees who are more likely to receive forgiveness under PSLF.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The calculations so far assume that the changes are unexpected.

    “The calculations so far assume that the changes are unexpected.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    If there is no reported trade line in any of these categories for a given borrower, the balance and payment due are zero.

    “If there is no reported trade line in any of these categories for a given borrower we assume a balance and payment due of zero.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The paper ignores precautionary savings considerations.

    “we ignore precautionary savings considerations (Blundell et al., 2008).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Absent forgiveness, forgiven borrowers and the comparison borrowers (those not yet forgiven or never forgiven in sample) would have followed parallel trends in the outcomes studied.

    “Comparison borrowers are those who have yet to have forgiveness or never will have forgiveness in sample.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The permanent-income hypothesis predicts the MPC from the annuity to be large, approximately 1.

    “A commonly cited benchmark in the consumption literature is the permanent-income hypothesis, which predicts the MPC from the annuity to be large, approximately 1.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The employment records firm size distribution skews towards larger and more established firms.

    “While we are not provided any firm characteristics beyond the NAICS industry, our understanding is that the employment records firm size distribution skews towards larger and more established firms.”
13 of 13

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Mortgage estimate has conflicting standard errors

    Major

    Table 5 reports a standard error of 453.110 for the dynamic-DID mortgage-balance estimate of 2318.755. Table C.8 reports 511.819 for the same estimate under forgiveness-cohort clustering, the clustering specified for Table 5.

  • Employment-record coverage has two incompatible individual counts

    Minor

    The description of the employment records gives about 370 million individuals, while the data appendix describes the same records as covering approximately 150 million unique individuals. The text does not identify a different population or period that reconciles the counts.

  • Actual-earnings comparison labels one value as predicted earnings

    Minor

    The appendix comparison is explicitly described as using actual rather than predicted earnings, but the Biden-proposal value in that comparison is labeled predicted earnings. That also makes the stated difference mix differently defined measures.

  • July 2022 discharge exceeds the reported cumulative increase

    Minor

    The cumulative total rises from $23.8 billion in June to $25.5 billion in July, an increase of only $1.7 billion. The July announcement alone lists $7.0 billion in discharged debt, which would bring the cumulative total to at least $30.8 billion.

    Reported 25.5 · recomputed 30.8

4 of 4

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [2]2. Chunlin Liu, and Nicholas S Souleles, "The reaction of consumer spending and debt to tax rebates-evidence from consumer credit data," Journal of Political Economy, 2007, 115 (6), 986-1019.
  2. [3]3. Gene Amromin, Itzhak Ben-David, Souphala Chomsisengphet, Tomasz Piskorski, and Amit Seru, "Policy intervention in debt renegotiation: Evidence from the home affordable modification program," Journal of Political Economy, 2017, 125 (3), 654-712.
  3. [16]16. Chaisemartin, Clément De and Xavier d'Haultfoeuille, "Difference-in-differences estimators of intertemporal treatment effects," Review of Economics and Statistics, 2024, pp. 1-45.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dinerstein, M., Earnest, S., Koustas, D., & Yannelis, C.
Affiliations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
NBER Working Paper Series
Published
2025-02
OpenAlex
W4407312571
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
Booth School of Business, University of Chicago
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Politics, Economics, and Education Policy
Keywords
student loan forgiveness, student debt, student loans, debt relief

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review