The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Empirical Assessment of the Proximity-Concentration Tradeoff between Multinational Sales and Trade
Open accessAbstract
This paper empirically investigates the role of transport costs, trade and investment barriers, production scale economies, and firm- specific advantages in determining the use of overseas production relative to exports. The proximity-concentration hypothesis is robust in explaining the share of total sales accounted for by affiliate sales: this share is greater the higher are transport costs and trade barriers and the lower are plant scale economies and investment barriers. Although strictly speaking, the proximity-concentration hypothesis applies to the shares of affiliate sales and exports rather than the levels, the effects of trade and investment barriers on the levels are similar to their effects on the shares, controlling for simultaneity, and so is that of freight factors in the trade estimates. The elasticity of inward and outward net affiliate sales with respect to tariffs is around 0.45, and that with respect to NTBs is an additional 0.17. The elasticity of both imports and exports with respect to freight factors is -1. However, the effect of freight factors on the level of affiliate sales is not robust, and the probability of observing any affiliate sales is increasing in proximity. The overall complementarity between trade and affiliate sales arises in part because relative income and intellectual property intensity increase both. In contrast, affiliate sales and trade move in opposite directions with increases in advertising intensity, suggesting that advertising-intensive products require a local presence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bernard, A. B., & Jensen, J. B. (2004) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/003465304323031111 · Cited by 1,591
Corruption and Foreign Direct Investment
Habib, M., & Zurawicki, L. (2002) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491017 · Cited by 1,321
Geographic Localization of International Technology Diffusion
Keller, W. (2002) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282802760015630 · Cited by 1,227
Firms, Contracts, and Trade Structure
Antras, P. (2003) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355303322552829 · Cited by 1,194
Estimating the Knowledge-Capital Model of the Multinational Enterprise: Comment
Blonigen, B. A., Davies, R. B., & Head, K. (2003) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282803322157214 · Cited by 867
Export-Platform Foreign Direct Investment
Ekholm, K., Forslid, R., & Markusen, J. R. (2007) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1162/jeea.2007.5.4.776 · Cited by 626
Dyadic military conflict, security alliances, and bilateral FDI flows
Li, Q., & Vashchilko, T. (2010) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2009.91 · Cited by 280
Endogenous R&D and foreign direct investment in international oligopolies
Petit, M.-L., & Sanna-Randaccio, F. (2000) · International Journal of Industrial Organization · doi:10.1016/s0167-7187(98)00028-9 · Cited by 131
Doh, J. P., Teegen, H., & Mudambi, R. (2004) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400082 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Brainard, S. L.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 1993-12
- OpenAlex
- W1892007971
- Cited by
- 1,647
- References
- 0
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.