Cited by 1,321Corruption and Economic DevelopmentInternational Business and FDIPolitical Influence and Corporate Strategies

Corruption and Foreign Direct Investment

Habib, Mohsin, Zurawicki, Leon·2002·Journal of International Business Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491017

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Habib, M., & Zurawicki, L.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
Venue
Journal of International Business Studies
Published
2002-06
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
291-307
ISSN
  • 0047-2506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-6990
OpenAlex
W2009712724
Cited by
1,321
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 96 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 79 · 2016: 81 · 2015: 85 · 2014: 70 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 66
FWCI
33.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of International Business Studies (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Corruption and Economic Development
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Keywords
corruption, foreign direct investment, host country corruption, investor behavior, operational inefficiency, cross-national comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review