The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Private Benefits of Control: An International Comparison
Open accessAbstract
We construct a measure of the private benefits of control in 39 countries based on 412 control transactions between 1990 and 2000.We find that the value of control ranges between -4% and +65%, with an average of 14 percent.As predicted by theory, in countries where private benefits of control are larger capital markets are less developed, ownership is more concentrated, and privatizations are less likely to take place as public offerings.We also analyze what institutions are most important in curbing these private benefits.A high degree of statutory protection of minority shareholders and high degree of law enforcement are associated with lower levels of private benefits of control, but so are a high level of diffusion of the press, a high rate of tax compliance, and a high degree of product market competition.A crude R-squared test suggests that the "non traditional" mechanisms have at least as much explanatory power as the legal ones commonly mentioned in the literature.In fact, in a multivariate analysis newspapers' circulation and tax compliance seem to be the dominating factors.We advance an explanation why this might be the case.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Survey of Corporate Governance
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x · Cited by 16,243
Corporate Ownership Around the World
La Porta, R., Lopez‐De‐Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00115 · Cited by 10,541
Legal Determinants of External Finance
LA PORTA, R., LOPEZ‐DE‐SILANES, F., SHLEIFER, A., & VISHNY, R. W. (1997) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb02727.x · Cited by 9,783
Financial Dependence and Growth
Rajan, R., & Zingales, L. (1996) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w5758 · Cited by 7,730
Self-citationThe Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences
Demsetz, H., & Lehn, K. (1985) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261354 · Cited by 6,236
A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding
Milgrom, P. R., & Weber, R. J. (1982) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1911865 · Cited by 3,753
Morck, R., Yeung, B., & Yu, W. (2000) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-405x(00)00071-4 · Cited by 3,335
Takeover Bids, The Free-Rider Problem, and the Theory of the Corporation
Grossman, S. J., & Hart, O. D. (1980) · The Bell Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/3003400 · Cited by 3,098
Legal Determinants of External Finance
Porta, R. L., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.2307/2329518 · Cited by 2,031
Zingales, L. (2000) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00262 · Cited by 1,495
Self-citation
Cited by
Burkart, M., Panunzi, F., & Shleifer, A. (2003) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/1540-6261.00601 · Cited by 1,113
Corporate Governance in Asia: A Survey
Claessens, S., & Fan, J. P. H. (2002) · International Review of Finance · doi:10.1111/1468-2443.00034 · Cited by 959
The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins
Porta, R. L., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2007) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w13608 · Cited by 892
Firm‐level Disclosures and the Relative Roles of Culture and Legal Origin
Hope, O. (2003) · Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting · doi:10.1111/1467-646x.00097 · Cited by 503
Auditors' Governance Functions and Legal Environments: An International Investigation*
Choi, J., & Wong, T. J. (2007) · Contemporary Accounting Research · doi:10.1506/x478-1075-4pw5-1501 · Cited by 489
Metadata
- Authors
- Dyck, A., & Zingales, L.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 2002-01
- OpenAlex
- W2890734298
- Cited by
- 578
- References
- 32
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Private Benefits of Control: An International Comparison. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w8711
- The paper
- Dyck, A., & Zingales, L. (2002). Private Benefits of Control: An International Comparison. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w8711
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.