Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 346

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome

·2020·Frontiers Research Topics

Abstract

An antiphospholipid antibody (APLA) syndrome has been proposed for those patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or with other connective tissue diseases who have APLA and manifestations that seem related to their effect (venous thrombosis, arterial occlusions, thrombocytopenia, hemolytic anemia, recurrent fetal loss, leg ulcers, and livedo reticularis). Occurrence of a primary antiphospholipid syndrome has also been mentioned but not defined. We present 9 young patients who had at least 2 of the clinical manifestations that have been related to high titers of APLA, but had neither SLE nor other recognizable connective tissue disease. We propose criteria for diagnosis of such a primary antiphospholipid syndrome and discuss the possible mechanisms whereby a single autoantibody can cause systemic disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/978-2-88966-108-4

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 346

Metadata

Venue
Frontiers Research Topics
Published
2020
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
482-8
ISSN
1664-8714 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2413103043
Cited by
346
References
0
FWCI
3.84
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/978-2-88966-108-4
The paper
Primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome. (2020). Frontiers Research Topics. https://doi.org/10.3389/978-2-88966-108-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.