The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bioceramics and Scaffolds: A Winning Combination for Tissue Engineering
Open accessAbstract
In the last few decades, we have assisted to a general increase of elder population worldwide associated with age-related pathologies. Therefore, there is the need for new biomaterials that can substitute damaged tissues, stimulate the body's own regenerative mechanisms, and promote tissue healing. Porous templates referred to as "scaffolds" are thought to be required for three-dimensional tissue growth. Bioceramics, a special set of fully, partially, or non-crystalline ceramics (e.g., calcium phosphates, bioactive glasses, and glass-ceramics) that are designed for the repair and reconstruction of diseased parts of the body, have high potential as scaffold materials. Traditionally, bioceramics have been used to fill and restore bone and dental defects (repair of hard tissues). More recently, this category of biomaterials has also revealed promising applications in the field of soft-tissue engineering. Starting with an overview of the fundamental requirements for tissue engineering scaffolds, this article provides a detailed picture on recent developments of porous bioceramics and composites, including a summary of common fabrication technologies and a critical analysis of structure-property and structure-function relationships. Areas of future research are highlighted at the end of this review, with special attention to the development of multifunctional scaffolds exploiting therapeutic ion/drug release and emerging applications beyond hard tissue repair.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bone grafts: which is the ideal biomaterial?
Haugen, H. J., Lyngstadaas, S. P., Rossi, F., & Perale, G. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/jcpe.13058 · Cited by 573
Bioactive Glasses: From Parent 45S5 Composition to Scaffold-Assisted Tissue-Healing Therapies
Fiume, E., Barberi, J., Verné, E., & Baino, F. (2018) · Journal of Functional Biomaterials · doi:10.3390/jfb9010024 · Cited by 313
Self-citationBaino, F., Fiorilli, S., & Vitale-Brovarone, C. (2016) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2016.06.033 · Cited by 294
Self-citationTissue Engineering Approaches in the Design of Healthy and Pathological In Vitro Tissue Models
Caddeo, S., Boffito, M., & Sartori, S. (2017) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2017.00040 · Cited by 285
The Use of Lactide Polymers in Bone Tissue Regeneration in Dentistry—A Systematic Review
Rajewska, J., Kowalski, J., Matys, J., Dobrzyński, M., & Wiglusz, R. J. (2023) · Journal of Functional Biomaterials · doi:10.3390/jfb14020083 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Baino, F., Novajra, G., & Vitale-Brovarone, C.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2015-12-17
- Volume
- 3
- Pages
- 202-202
- ISSN
- 2296-4185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2216079337
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bioceramics and Scaffolds: A Winning Combination for Tissue Engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fbioe.2015.00202
- The paper
- Baino, F., Novajra, G., & Vitale-Brovarone, C. (2015). Bioceramics and Scaffolds: A Winning Combination for Tissue Engineering. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2015.00202
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.